ArticleIntensive care medicine2016
Understanding clinical signs of poor tissue perfusion during septic shock.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Early Goal Directed Therapy Using a Physiological Holistic View. A Multicenter Study in Latin America: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Study
Capillary Refill Time Response to a Rapid Fluid Challenge in Septic Shock Patients: Pathophysiological Determinants, and Relation to Changes in Systemic, Regional and Microcirculatory Blood Flow
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing Clinical Deterioration in Children With Dark-Coloured Skin: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Prognostic impact of early versus delayed loop diuretic administration in sepsis: a propensity score-matched analysis using the MIMIC-IV database.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- A Mortality Risk Prediction Model for Septic Shock in Patients Aged ≥50: Role of Norepinephrine Index and Procalcitonin.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- A comparison of invasive arterial blood pressure measurement with oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure measurement in patients with sepsis.Journal of anesthesia · 2024Article
- Mottling as a prognosis marker in cardiogenic shock.Annals of intensive care · 2023Article
- Peripheral ischemic reserve in sepsis and septic shock as a new bedside prognostic enrichment tool: A Brazilian cohort study.PloS one · 2023Observational
- Review
- Mean core to peripheral temperature difference and mean lactate levels in first 6 hours of hospitalisation as two indicators of prognosis: an observational cohort study.BMC pediatrics · 2020Observational
- Assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: consensus and debate.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Review
- Monitoring peripheral perfusion in sepsis associated acute kidney injury: Analysis of mortality.PloS one · 2020Observational
- Can Peripheral Skin Perfusion Be Used to Assess Organ Perfusion and Guide Resuscitation Interventions?Frontiers in medicine · 2020Review
- Minimizing catecholamines and optimizing perfusion.Critical care (London, England) · 2019Review
- Mottling score is a strong predictor of 14-day mortality in septic patients whatever vasopressor doses and other tissue perfusion parameters.Critical care (London, England) · 2019Article
- Narrative review: clinical assessment of peripheral tissue perfusion in septic shock.Annals of intensive care · 2019Review
- Clinical examination: a trigger but not a substitute for hemodynamic evaluation.Intensive care medicine · 2019Article
- Frugal innovation for critical care.Intensive care medicine · 2019Article
- The ten pitfalls of lactate clearance in sepsis.Intensive care medicine · 2019Article
- Assessment of Regional Perfusion and Organ Function: Less and Non-invasive Techniques.Frontiers in medicine · 2019Review
- Should we treat mild hypotension in septic patients in the absence of peripheral tissue hypoperfusion?Intensive care medicine · 2018Article
- Could resuscitation be based on microcirculation data? Yes.Intensive care medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.