Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26846379›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2016

Reorganization of Intact Descending Motor Circuits to Replace Lost Connections After Injury.

Kathren L Fink, William B J Cafferty

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Spinal control of locomotion before and after spinal cord injury.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathren L FinkDepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
William B J CaffertyDepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. william.cafferty@yale.edu.
Yale University · US

Funding

PRG3 drives functional plasticity in intact circuits after spinal cord injuryR01NS095930 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CAFFERTY, WILLIAM B. · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS095930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons have a limited capacity to regenerate in the adult central nervous system (CNS). The inability of damaged axons to re-establish original circuits results in permanent functional impairment after spinal cord injury (SCI). Despite abortive regeneration of axotomized CNS neurons, limited spontaneous recovery of motor function emerges after partial SCI in humans and experimental rodent models of SCI. It is hypothesized that this spontaneous functional recovery is the result of the reorganization of descending motor pathways spared by the injury, suggesting that plasticity of intact circuits is a potent alternative conduit to enhance functional recovery after SCI. In support of this hypothesis, several studies have shown that after unilateral corticospinal tract (CST) lesion (unilateral pyramidotomy), the intact CST functionally sprouts into the denervated side of the spinal cord. Furthermore, pharmacologic and genetic methods that enhance the intrinsic growth capacity of adult neurons or block extracellular growth inhibitors are effective at significantly enhancing intact CST reorganization and recovery of motor function. Owing to its importance in controlling fine motor behavior in primates, the CST is the most widely studied descending motor pathway; however, additional studies in rodents have shown that plasticity within other spared descending motor pathways, including the rubrospinal tract, raphespinal tract, and reticulospinal tract, can also result in restoration of function after incomplete SCI. Identifying the molecular mechanisms that drive plasticity within intact circuits is crucial in developing novel, potent, and specific therapeutics to restore function after SCI. In this review we discuss the evidence supporting a focus on exploring the capacity of intact motor circuits to functionally repair the damaged CNS after SCI.

Indexed as

AnimalsEfferent PathwaysHumansMotor NeuronsNerve RegenerationNeuronal PlasticitySpinal CordSpinal Cord InjuriesAxonNeuronPlasticityRegenerationRepairSpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID26846379
PMCPMC4824020
OpenAlexW2252769974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.