ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2017
Choosing exercise or pharmacologic stress imaging, or exercise ECG testing alone: How to decide.
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validity of mental and physical stress models.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024Review
- Exercise Stress Echocardiography in Athletes: Applications, Methodology, and Challenges.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- The prognostic implications of ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities in patients undergoing regadenoson stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Comparison of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve with dobutamine and dipyridamole stress using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Quantification of PET Myocardial Blood Flow.Current cardiology reports · 2019Review
- Current approach to the diagnosis of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease: more questions than answers.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26846366What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.