Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26846166›Full record

Observational studyBMC complementary and alternative medicine2016

Patients Receiving Integrative Medicine Effectiveness Registry (PRIMIER) of the BraveNet practice-based research network: study protocol.

Jeffery A Dusek, Donald I Abrams, Rhonda Roberts, Kristen H Griffin, Desiree Trebesch, Rowena J Dolor, Ruth Q Wolever, M Diane McKee, Benjamin Kligler

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01754038 completednot on this map

Patients Receiving Integrative Medicine Interventions Effectiveness Registry

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBraveNetRan2013 to 2019Enrolled5,069ConditionsAll Conditions of Integrative Medicine Clinic Patients
NCT04512755 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

AIMS Medical Outcomes Study

TypeobservationalSponsorAdvanced Integrative Medical Science InstituteRan2020 to 2030Enrolled500ConditionsMental Health Issue, PTSD, Pain, Chronic Pain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Acupuncture intervention for acute pain in the Emergency Department trial: a consensus process.Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society · 2022
    Article
  6. Practice-Based Research Networks and Massage Therapy: a Scoping Review.International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffery A DusekIntegrative Health Research Center, Penny George Institute for Health and Healing, Allina Health, 2925 Chicago Avenue South, Mail Route 10039, Minneapolis, MN, 55407-1321, USA. Jeffery.Dusek@allina.com.
Donald I AbramsOsher Center for Integrative Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rhonda RobertsDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Kristen H GriffinIntegrative Health Research Center, Penny George Institute for Health and Healing, Allina Health, 2925 Chicago Avenue South, Mail Route 10039, Minneapolis, MN, 55407-1321, USA.
Desiree TrebeschIntegrative Health Research Center, Penny George Institute for Health and Healing, Allina Health, 2925 Chicago Avenue South, Mail Route 10039, Minneapolis, MN, 55407-1321, USA.
Rowena J DolorDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Ruth Q WoleverDuke Integrative Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
M Diane McKeeAlbert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, New York, USA.
Benjamin KliglerDepartment of Integrative Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Allina Health · USDuke Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USYeshiva University · US

Funding

Translational Research CoreP30DK020541 · NIDDK · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI STREAMSON C CHUA · 2015 to 2026
$27.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegrative medicine (IM) provides patient-centered care and addresses the full range of physical, emotional, mental, social, spiritual, and environmental influences that affect a person's health. IM is a "whole systems" approach that employs multiple modalities as opposed to an isolated complementary therapy. Thus, studying outcomes of IM is more challenging than evaluating an isolated intervention. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) allow for clinicians/investigators at multiple diverse sites using common methodology to pool their data, increase participant sample size and increase generalizability of results. To conduct real-world, practice-based research, the Bravewell Collaborative founded BraveNet in 2007 as the first national integrative medicine PBRN. METHODS AND

designPatients Receiving Integrative Medicine Effectiveness Registry (PRIMIER) is a prospective, non-randomized, observational evaluation conducted at fourteen clinical sites. Participants receive a non-standardized, personalized, multimodal IM approach for various medical conditions. Using the REDCap electronic platform, an anticipated 10,000 study participants will complete patient-reported outcome measures including Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29, Perceived Stress Scale-4, and the Patient Activation Measure at baseline, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Extractions from participants' electronic health records include IM services received, as well as ICD diagnostic codes, and CPT billing codes associated with each IM visit. Repeated-measures analyses will be performed on data to assess change from baseline through 24 months with planned subgroup analyses to include specific clinical population and specific IM intervention or combinations. DISCUSSION: As the PRIMIER registry grows, we anticipate that our results would provide an indication of the promise of PBRN research efforts in IM. Analyses will incorporate a large sample of participants and an expected 10-year observation period and will provide the ability to evaluate the effect of IM on outcomes for specific clinical populations and specific IM interventions or combinations. As such, PRIMIER will serve as a national platform for future evaluations of IM best practices.

trial registrationClinical Trials.gov NCT01754038.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsIntegrative MedicineRegistriesAdolescentAdultAgedBiomedical ResearchCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Outcome AssessmentProspective StudiesSelf ReportYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26846166
PMCPMC4743108
OpenAlexW2258338141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.