Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26845574›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Using Win-Win Strategies to Implement Health in All Policies: A Cross-Case Analysis.

Agnes Molnar, Emilie Renahy, Patricia O'Campo, Carles Muntaner, Alix Freiler, Ketan Shankardass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Healthy Governance for Cities: Synergizing Health in All Policies (HiAP) and Healthy Cities Approaches.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. 'Health in All Policies'-A Key Driver for Health and Well-Being in a Post-COVID-19 Pandemic World.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Agnes MolnarCentre for Research on Inner City Health, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Emilie RenahyCentre for Research on Inner City Health, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patricia O'CampoCentre for Research on Inner City Health, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Carles MuntanerDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alix FreilerCentre for Research on Inner City Health, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ketan ShankardassCentre for Research on Inner City Health, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn spite of increasing research into intersections of public policy and health, little evidence shows how policy processes impact the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP) initiatives. Our research sought to understand how and why strategies for engaging partners from diverse policy sectors in the implementation of HiAP succeed or fail in order to uncover the underlying social mechanisms contributing to sustainable implementation of HiAP.

methodsIn this explanatory multiple case study, we analyzed grey and peer-review literature and key informant interviews to identify mechanisms leading to implementation successes and failures in relation to different strategies for engagement across three case studies (Sweden, Quebec and South Australia), after accounting for the role of different contextual conditions.

findingsOur results yielded no support for the use of awareness-raising or directive strategies as standalone approaches for engaging partners to implement HiAP. However, we found strong evidence that mechanisms related to "win-win" strategies facilitated implementation by increasing perceived acceptability (or buy-in) and feasibility of HiAP implementation across sectors. Win-win strategies were facilitated by mechanisms related to several activities, including: the development of a shared language to facilitate communication between actors from different sectors; integrating health into other policy agendas (eg., sustainability) and use of dual outcomes to appeal to the interests of diverse policy sectors; use of scientific evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of HiAP; and using health impact assessment to make policy coordination for public health outcomes more feasible and to give credibility to policies being developed by diverse policy sectors.

conclusionOur findings enrich theoretical understanding in an under-unexplored area of intersectoral action. They also provide policy makers with examples of HiAP across wealthy welfare regimes, and improve understanding of successful HiAP implementation practices, including the win-win approach.

Indexed as

Health Plan ImplementationHealth PolicyPublic HealthCultureHealth Impact AssessmentHealth ResourcesHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePublic Health SurveillanceQuebecSouth AustraliaSweden

Identifiers

PMID26845574
PMCPMC4742077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.