Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26845490›Full record

SynthesisDigestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society2016

Self-expanding metal stents for acute refractory esophageal variceal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thomas R McCarty, Basile Njei

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Gastrointestinal bleeding in old age].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Outcomes after placement of a SX-ELLA oesophageal stent for refractory variceal bleeding-A national multicentre study.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2019
    Article
  14. Update on the management of gastrointestinal varices.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2019
    Review
  15. A simplified technique of esophageal self-expandable metallic stent placement without fluoroscopic and endoscopic guidance for treating esophageal carcinoma.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2018
    Article
  16. Management of Refractory Variceal Bleed in Cirrhosis.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas R McCartyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
Basile NjeiSection of Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
Yale Cancer Center · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Liver CenterP30DK034989 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI YASUKO IWAKIRI · 1986 to 2026
$31.1M
Training Program in Investigative HepatologyT32DK007356 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL H NATHANSON · 1986 to 2026
$7.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034989NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimEsophageal variceal bleeding is a severe complication of portal hypertension with significant morbidity and mortality. A substantial portion of cirrhotics fail to respond to conventional medical therapy and band ligation, necessitating alternative treatments including self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) placement for acute refractory esophageal variceal bleeding. In the present study, we carried out a systematic review and structured meta-analysis of all eligible studies to evaluate the technical feasibility, safety, clinical efficacy, and survival advantage of SEMS placement for the treatment of of acute esophageal variceal bleeding.

methodsSearches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were carried out through December 2015. Individual study proportions were transformed into a quantity using the Freeman-Tukey variant of the arcsine square root transformed proportion. Combined weighted proportions, and meta-regression were then determined.

resultsThe search yielded 12 studies involving n = 155 patients included in our meta-analysis. Pooled clinical success rate in achieving hemostasis within 24 h was 96% (95% CI, 0.90-1.00). Technical success for SEMS deployment endoscopically was achieved in 97% of patients (95% CI, 0.91-1.00). Total adverse events (including rebleeding after 48 h, ulceration, and stent migration) were shown in 36% of patients after SEMS placement (95% CI, 0.23-0.50). Pooled 30-day and 60-day survival rates were 68% (95% CI, 0.56-0.80) and 64% (95% CI, 0.48-0.78), respectively.

conclusionThis study demonstrated that esophageal SEMS placement is a technically feasible modality and highly efficacious in achieving hemostasis in acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage.

Indexed as

Self Expandable Metallic StentsAcute DiseaseEsophageal and Gastric VaricesGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansbleedingcirrhosisesophageal varicesself-expanding metal stent (SEMS)stent

Identifiers

PMID26845490
PMCPMC4940258
OpenAlexW2292717019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.