Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26845105›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2016

Should states adopt newborn screening for early infantile Krabbe disease?

David P Dimmock

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. An online compendium of treatable genetic disorders.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2021
    Article
  4. The critical role of psychosine in screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of Krabbe disease.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David P DimmockHuman Molecular Genetics Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6690-2523
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The published experience to date regarding implementing NBS for EIKD has been dramatically enhanced by the data presented in this issue by Orsini et al. Although much has been written about the potential harms to individuals with an abnormal NBS for EIKD who do not have EIKD, several commentators have also asked whether screening provides a benefit when it leads to early identification of the disorder. Orsini and colleagues’ data suggest that the state-mandated, multimillion-dollar NBS program for EIKD in New York has failed to provide significant benefit to children with EIKD. Indeed, in addition to the potential harm to families receiving false-positive test results, NBS for EIKD appears to have resulted in a reduction in survival in individuals who have the disease. The data from the New York program suggest that NBS for EIKD should be abandoned, pending the development of improved screening or therapies shown to confer both survival and quality-of-life benefits over supportive care. The results of this experience suggest that research efforts should be focused on improving presymptomatic treatment outcomes in children identified by NBS prior to the redeployment of mandatory presymptomatic screening.

Indexed as

Leukodystrophy, Globoid CellNeonatal ScreeningHumansInfant, NewbornNew YorkResearchTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26845105
OpenAlexW2321651014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.