Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26844836›Full record

ArticleNeuron2016

Excitatory Cerebellar Nucleocortical Circuit Provides Internal Amplification during Associative Conditioning.

Zhenyu Gao, Martina Proietti-Onori, Zhanmin Lin, Michiel M Ten Brinke, Henk-Jan Boele, Jan-Willem Potters, Tom J H Ruigrok, Freek E Hoebeek, Chris I De Zeeuw

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Cerebellar microcircuits enable robust evidence-based decisions through cortico-cerebellar coupling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhenyu GaoDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 CN Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: z.gao@erasmusmc.nl.
Martina Proietti-OnoriDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 CN Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Zhanmin LinDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 CN Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Michiel M Ten BrinkeDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 CN Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Henk-Jan BoeleDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 CN Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jan-Willem PottersDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 CN Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Tom J H RuigrokDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 CN Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Freek E HoebeekDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 CN Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Chris I De ZeeuwDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 CN Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Dutch Academy of Arts & Sciences (KNAW), 1105 BA Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: c.dezeeuw@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Closed-loop circuitries between cortical and subcortical regions can facilitate precision of output patterns, but the role of such networks in the cerebellum remains to be elucidated. Here, we characterize the role of internal feedback from the cerebellar nuclei to the cerebellar cortex in classical eyeblink conditioning. We find that excitatory output neurons in the interposed nucleus provide efference-copy signals via mossy fibers to the cerebellar cortical zones that belong to the same module, triggering monosynaptic responses in granule and Golgi cells and indirectly inhibiting Purkinje cells. Upon conditioning, the local density of nucleocortical mossy fiber terminals significantly increases. Optogenetic activation and inhibition of nucleocortical fibers in conditioned animals increases and decreases the amplitude of learned eyeblink responses, respectively. Our data show that the excitatory nucleocortical closed-loop circuitry of the cerebellum relays a corollary discharge of premotor signals and suggests an amplifying role of this circuitry in controlling associative motor learning.

Indexed as

AnimalsAssociation LearningBlinkingCerebellar CortexCerebellar NucleiConditioning, ClassicalFemaleMaleMiceNerve FibersNeural PathwaysOptogenetics

Identifiers

PMID26844836
PMCPMC4742536
OpenAlexW2270852892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.