ArticleNeuron2016
Recurrent Feedback Loops in Associative Learning.
Article in Neuron, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An octopamine-specific GRAB sensor reveals a monoamine relay circuitry that boosts aversive learning.National science review · 2024Article
- An octopamine-specific GRAB sensor reveals a monoamine relay circuitry that boosts aversive learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Cerebellar control of fear learning via the cerebellar nuclei-Multiple pathways, multiple mechanisms?Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this issue of Neuron, Gao et al. (2016) report on a little-studied feedback pathway from the cerebellar nuclei back to the cerebellar cortex. They find that it contributes to associative conditioning and execution of learned movements, highlighting a role for local feedback loops in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26844826What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.