Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26844804›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2016

Unlocking neural complexity with a robotic key.

Peter Stratton, Michael Hasselmo, Michael Milford

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Neural mechanisms for spatial computation.The Journal of physiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter StrattonQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Michael HasselmoDepartment of Psychology, Program in Neurosciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael MilfordAustralian Centre for Robotic Vision and School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

Prefrontal and Medial-Temporal Interactions in MemoryP50MH094263 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI MILLER, EARL K · 2011 to 2015
$8.7M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH094263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex brains evolved in order to comprehend and interact with complex environments in the real world. Despite significant progress in our understanding of perceptual representations in the brain, our understanding of how the brain carries out higher level processing remains largely superficial. This disconnect is understandable, since the direct mapping of sensory inputs to perceptual states is readily observed, while mappings between (unknown) stages of processing and intermediate neural states is not. We argue that testing theories of higher level neural processing on robots in the real world offers a clear path forward, since (1) the complexity of the neural robotic controllers can be staged as necessary, avoiding the almost intractable complexity apparent in even the simplest current living nervous systems; (2) robotic controller states are fully observable, avoiding the enormous technical challenge of recording from complete intact brains; and (3) unlike computational modelling, the real world can stand for itself when using robots, avoiding the computational intractability of simulating the world at an arbitrary level of detail. We suggest that embracing the complex and often unpredictable closed-loop interactions between robotic neuro-controllers and the physical world will bring about deeper understanding of the role of complex brain function in the high-level processing of information and the control of behaviour.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain MappingComputer SimulationHumansNerve NetNeuronsRobotics

Identifiers

PMID26844804
PMCPMC5108902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.