Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26844550›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

The Influence of a Metal Stent on the Distribution of Thermal Energy during Irreversible Electroporation.

Hester J Scheffer, Jantien A Vogel, Willemien van den Bos, Robert E Neal, Krijn P van Lienden, Marc G H Besselink, Martin J C van Gemert, Cees W M van der Geld, Martijn R Meijerink, John H Klaessens and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Safety, Efficacy, and Technical Details of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography After Irreversible Electroporation for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hester J SchefferDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jantien A VogelDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Willemien van den BosDepartment of Urology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert E NealDepartment of Radiology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Krijn P van LiendenDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc G H BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martin J C van GemertDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cees W M van der GeldDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Martijn R MeijerinkDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
John H KlaessensDepartment of Physics and Medical Technology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rudolf M VerdaasdonkDepartment of Physics and Medical Technology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIrreversible electroporation (IRE) uses short duration, high-voltage electrical pulses to induce cell death via nanoscale defects resulting from altered transmembrane potential. The technique is gaining interest for ablations in unresectable pancreatic and hepatobiliary cancer. Metal stents are often used for palliative biliary drainage in these patients, but are currently seen as an absolute contraindication for IRE due to the perceived risk of direct heating of the metal and its surroundings. This study investigates the thermal and tissue viability changes due to a metal stent during IRE.

methodsIRE was performed in a homogeneous tissue model (polyacrylamide gel), without and with a metal stent placed perpendicular and parallel to the electrodes, delivering 90 and 270 pulses (15-35 A, 90 μsec, 1.5 cm active tip exposure, 1.5 cm interelectrode distance, 1000-1500 V/cm, 90 pulses/min), and in-vivo in a porcine liver (4 ablations). Temperature changes were measured with an infrared thermal camera and with fiber-optic probes. Tissue viability after in-vivo IRE was investigated macroscopically using 5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) vitality staining.

resultsIn the gel, direct stent-heating was not observed. Contrarily, the presence of a stent between the electrodes caused a higher increase in median temperature near the electrodes (23.2 vs 13.3°C [90 pulses]; p = 0.021, and 33.1 vs 24.8°C [270 pulses]; p = 0.242). In-vivo, no temperature difference was observed for ablations with and without a stent. Tissue examination showed white coagulation 1mm around the electrodes only. A rim of vital tissue remained around the stent, whereas ablation without stent resulted in complete tissue avitality.

conclusionIRE in the vicinity of a metal stent does not cause notable direct heating of the metal, but results in higher temperatures around the electrodes and remnant viable tissue. Future studies should determine for which clinical indications IRE in the presence of metal stents is safe and effective.

Indexed as

ElectroporationHot TemperatureMetalsStentsAnimalsElectrodesLiverSwineMetals

Identifiers

PMID26844550
PMCPMC4742246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.