Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26844473›Full record

ArticleMedicine2016

Differential Effects of Bariatric Surgery Versus Exercise on Excessive Visceral Fat Deposits.

Fu-Zong Wu, Yi-Luan Huang, Carol C Wu, Yen-Chi Wang, Hsiang-Ju Pan, Chin-Kun Huang, Lee-Ren Yeh, Ming-Ting Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Obesity and the risk of cardiometabolic diseases.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fu-Zong WuFrom the Department of Radiology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (F-ZW, Y-LH, Y-CW, M-TW); Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan (F-ZW, Y-LH, M-TW); Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan (F-ZW, Y-LH, M-TW); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (CCW); Department of Family Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (H-JP); Bariatric & Metabolic International Surgery Center, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (C-KH); and Department of Radiology, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (L-RY).
Yi-Luan Huang
Carol C Wu
Yen-Chi Wang
Hsiang-Ju Pan
Chin-Kun Huang
Lee-Ren Yeh
Ming-Ting Wu
University of the Ryukyus University Hospital · JPNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare differential impacts of bariatric surgery and exercise-induced weight loss on excessive abdominal and cardiac fat deposition.Excessive fat accumulation around the heart may play an important role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. Recent evidences have suggested that bariatric surgery results in relatively less decrease in epicardial fat compared with abdominal visceral fat and paracardial fat.Sixty-four consecutive overweight or obese subjects were enrolled in the study. Clinical characteristics and metabolic profiles were recorded. The volumes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue (AVAT), abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (ASAT), epicardial (EAT), and paracardial adipose tissue (PAT) were measured by computed tomography in the bariatric surgery group (N = 25) and the exercise group (N = 39) at baseline and 3 months after intervention. Subjects in both the surgery and exercise groups showed significant reduction in body mass index (15.97%, 7.47%), AVAT (40.52%, 15.24%), ASAT (31.40, 17.34%), PAT (34.40%, 12.05%), and PAT + EAT (22.31%, 17.72%) (all P < 0.001) after intervention compared with baseline. In both the groups, the decrease in EAT was small compared with the other compartments (P < 0.01 in both groups). Compared with the exercise group, the surgery group had greater loss in abdominal and cardiac visceral adipose tissue (AVAT, ASAT, PAT, EAT+PAT) (P < 0.001), but lesser loss in EAT (P = 0.037).Compared with the exercise group, bariatric surgery results in significantly greater percentage loss of excessive fat deposits except for EAT. EAT, but not PAT, was relatively preserved despite weight reduction in both the groups. The physiological impact of persistent EAT deserves further investigation.

Indexed as

AdiposityPericardiumAdultBariatric SurgeryBody Mass IndexCardiovascular DiseasesExercise TherapyFemaleHumansIntra-Abdominal FatMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidSubcutaneous Fat, AbdominalWeight Loss

Identifiers

PMID26844473
PMCPMC4748890
OpenAlexW2331663965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.