Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26844471›Full record

ArticleMedicine2016

Development and Validation of an HIV Risk Exposure and Indicator Conditions Questionnaire to Support Targeted HIV Screening.

María Jesús Pérez Elías, Cristina Gómez-Ayerbe, Pilar Pérez Elías, Alfonso Muriel, Santiago Diaz de Alberto, María Martinez-Colubi, Ana Moreno, Cristina Santos, Lidia Polo, Rafa Barea and 7 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Post-exposure prophylaxis against HIV, the view from the emergency department - authos´s response].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

María Jesús Pérez ElíasFrom the Infectious Diseases Department (MJPE, CG-A, ADDS, AM, GR, CQ, FD, JLC, SM), Ramón y Cajal Hospital, IRYCIS; Centro de Salud García Noblejas (PPE, CS, LP, RB, AU, ACE), IRYCIS; Biostatistics Unit (AM), Ramón y Cajal Hospital, IRYCIS; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP) (AM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; Facultad de Económicas y Administración de Empresas, Departamento de Economía Aplicada (AM); and Hospital de La Moraleja (MM-C), Sanitas, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Gómez-Ayerbe
Pilar Pérez Elías
Alfonso Muriel
Santiago Diaz de Alberto
María Martinez-Colubi
Ana Moreno
Cristina Santos
Lidia Polo
Rafa Barea
Gema Robledillo
Almudena Uranga
Cano Espín Agustina
Carmen Quereda
Fernando Dronda
Jose Luis Casado
Santiago Moreno

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of our study was to develop a Spanish-structured HIV risk of exposure and indicator conditions (RE&IC) questionnaire. People attending to an emergency room or to a primary clinical care center were offered to participate in a prospective, 1 arm, open label study, in which all enrolled patients filled out our developed questionnaire and were HIV tested. Questionnaire accuracy, feasibility, and reliability were evaluated.Valid paired 5329 HIV RE&IC questionnaire and rapid HIV tests were performed, 69.3% in the primary clinical care center, 49.6% women, median age 37 years old, 74.9% Spaniards, 20.1% Latin-Americans. Confirmed hidden HIV infection was detected in 4.1%, while HIV RE&IC questionnaire was positive in 51.2%. HIV RE&IC questionnaire sensitivity was 100% to predict HIV infection, with a 100% negative predictive value. When considered separately, RE or IC items sensitivity decreases to 86.4% or 91%, and similarly their negative predictive value to 99.9% for both of them. The majority of people studied, 90.8% self-completed HIV RE&IC questionnaire. Median time to complete was 3 minutes. Overall HIV RE&IC questionnaire test-retest Kappa agreement was 0.82 (almost perfect), likewise for IC items 0.89, while for RE items was lower 0.78 (substantial).A feasible and reliable Spanish HIV RE&IC self questionnaire accurately discriminated all non-HIV-infected people without missing any HIV diagnoses, in a low prevalence HIV infection area. The best accuracy and reliability were obtained when combining HIV RE&IC items.

Indexed as

LanguageAdultData AccuracyFemaleHispanic or LatinoHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26844471
PMCPMC4748888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.