Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26844145›Full record

ReviewPreventive medicine reports2015

From built environment to health inequalities: An explanatory framework based on evidence.

Elena Gelormino, Giulia Melis, Cristina Marietta, Giuseppe Costa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Preventive medicine reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Shaping Pathways to Child Health: A Systematic Review of Street-Scale Interventions in City Streets.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Shaping healthier futures: community-level impact of the Alberta Healthy Communities Approach.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. [Primary Care Inequalities to the Disadvantage of the Population of Socially Deprived Urban Areas: A Case Study of Essen, Germany].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Selected Research Issues of Urban Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elena GelorminoDepartment of Public Health, Local Health Authority TO5, Piedmont Region, Italy.
Giulia MelisEnvironmental Heritage and Urban Redevelopment - SiTI Higher Institute on Territorial Systems for Innovation, Turin, via Pier Carlo Boggio 61, 10138 Torino, Italy.
Cristina MariettaEnvironmental Heritage and Urban Redevelopment Unit - SiTI Higher Institute on Territorial Systems for Innovation, Turin, via Pier Carlo Boggio 61, 10138 Torino, Italy.
Giuseppe CostaDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, via Sabaudia 94, 10095 Grugliasco, Torino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Health in All Policies strategy aims to engage every policy domain in health promotion. The more socially disadvantaged groups are usually more affected by potential negative impacts of policies if they are not health oriented. The built environment represents an important policy domain and, apart from its housing component, its impact on health inequalities is seldom assessed.

methodsA scoping review of evidence on the built environment and its health equity impact was carried out, searching both urban and medical literature since 2000 analysing socio-economic inequalities in relation to different components of the built environment.

resultsThe proposed explanatory framework assumes that key features of built environment (identified as density, functional mix and public spaces and services), may influence individual health through their impact on both natural environment and social context, as well as behaviours, and that these effects may be unequally distributed according to the social position of individuals.

conclusionIn general, the expected links proposed by the framework are well documented in the literature; however, evidence of their impact on health inequalities remains uncertain due to confounding factors, heterogeneity in study design, and difficulty to generalize evidence that is still very embedded to local contexts.

Indexed as

Built environmentEquityHealth in All PoliciesHealth inequalitiesNeighbourhoodUrban health

Identifiers

PMID26844145
PMCPMC4721462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.