Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26844126›Full record

ReviewPreventive medicine reports2015

Farmers sun exposure, skin protection and public health campaigns: An Australian perspective.

Christel Smit-Kroner, Susan Brumby

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Preventive medicine reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Seasonal and lifelong changes in skin colour and pigmentation of Austrian farming families: an exploratory study.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinicopathological Pattern of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer in Kuwait: A Retrospective Study.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Review on Sun Exposure and Skin Diseases.Indian journal of dermatology
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christel Smit-KronerNational Centre for Farmer Health, Deakin University, School of Medicine, Box 283, Hamilton, VIC 3300, Australia.
Susan BrumbyNational Centre for Farmer Health, Deakin University, School of Medicine, Box 283, Hamilton, VIC 3300, Australia; Western District Health Service, 20 Foster Street, Hamilton, VIC 3300, Australia.
Deakin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-melanoma skin cancer is a common and costly cancer in agricultural populations. Prevention and early detection are an effective way to decrease the burden of disease and associated costs. To examine sun exposure and skin protection practices in agricultural workers and farmers a thematic review of the literature between 1983 and 2014 was undertaken. Comparison between studies was complicated by differences in study design, definitions of skin protection, and analytic methods used. Farmers are the most exposed to harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation of all outdoor workers and the level of reported skin protection by farmers is suboptimal. Years of public health campaigns have failed to adequately address farmers' specific needs. Increased rates of skin cancer and subsequent higher costs are expected. Estimates of sun exposure and skin protection practice indicate that protective clothing is the most promising avenue to improve on farmers' skin protection. Early detection needs to be part of public health campaigns. This review explores the quantitative data about Australian farmers and their skin protective behaviours. We investigate what the documented measurable effect of the public health campaign Slip!Slop!Slap! has had on agricultural workers and farmers and make recommendations for future focus.

Indexed as

Agricultural workers' diseaseClothingDisease costHealth campaignsSunscreensUltraviolet rays

Identifiers

PMID26844126
PMCPMC4721376
OpenAlexW988682646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.