ArticlePreventive medicine reports2015
Determinants of healthcare provider recommendations for influenza vaccinations.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers of Influenza Vaccination Intention and Behavior - A Systematic Review of Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy, 2005 - 2016.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Addressing influenza in Bangladesh: closing evidence and policy gaps with strategic interventions.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2025Review
- Physicians' Intentions to Recommend Influenza Vaccine: A Multi-Centered Hospital-Based Study Using the Theory of Planned Behavior in Bangladesh.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Secondary Risk in COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions: A Theoretical Contribution to the Protection Motivation Paradigm.Journal of applied social science · 2023Article
- Prevalence of influenza-specific vaccination hesitancy among adults in the United States, 2018.Vaccine · 2023Article
- The mediating effects of barriers to vaccination on the relationship between race/ethnicity and influenza vaccination status in a rural Southeastern Louisiana medical center.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2022Article
- Comparing racial health disparities in pandemics a decade apart: H1N1 and COVID-19.Future healthcare journal · 2021Article
- Vaccine Hesitancy: Drivers and How the Allergy Community Can Help.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2021Review
- Using the health belief model to identify barriers to seasonal influenza vaccination among Australian adults in 2019.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2021Article
- Influenza vaccination coverage among splenectomized patients: an Italian study on the role of active recall in the vaccination compliance.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2019Article
- Understanding and Increasing Influenza Vaccination Acceptance: Insights from a 2016 National Survey of U.S. Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Self-rated health and reasons for non-vaccination against seasonal influenza in Canadian adults with asthma.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveInvestigate determinants of receiving healthcare provider (HCP) recommendations for seasonal and H1N1 influenza vaccinations.
methodsUsing a United States national sample of adults 18 + from the National 2009 H1N1 Flu Survey, multivariate regression models estimated the likelihood of receiving a HCP recommendation. Covariates included demographics, socioeconomic status, and Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) priority groups.
resultsAdults age 55-64 and 65 + were more likely to report a HCP recommendation when compared to adults age 18-34 (OR: 1.483, 95%CI: 1.237-1.778 and OR: 1.738, 95%CI: 1.427-2.116, respectively). Chronically ill adults had 58.0% (95%CI: 1.414-1.765) higher odds of receiving a HCP recommendation than non-chronically ill adults. Patients visiting a doctor once and twice had 28.7% (95%CI: 0.618-0.821) and 17.1% (95%CI: 0.721-0.952) lower odds of receiving a HCP recommendation when compared to adults visiting their doctor at least four times. And, compared to Non-Hispanic Whites, Non-Hispanic Blacks had 28.4% (95%CI: 1.064-1.549) higher odds of receiving a recommendation.
conclusionsACIP priority groups experienced higher rates of recommendations compared to non-ACIP groups. Racial differences in HCP recommendations cannot explain racial disparities in flu vaccination rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.