ArticlePreventive medicine reports2015
The economic burden of eating disorders and related mental health comorbidities: An exploratory analysis using the U.S. Medical Expenditures Panel Survey.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Prevalence of Excessive Exercise in Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2025Pooled it
- Global and Regional Economic Burden of Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review and Critique of Methods.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Pooled it
- The Use of Virtual Reality in Patients with Eating Disorders: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness of three internet-based interventions for eating disorders: A randomized controlled trial.The International journal of eating disorders · 2022Trial
- Does healthcare expenditure matter equally for all mental disorders? An international approach employing dynamic panel data methods.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- A Historical Cohort Comparison After Inpatient Admission for Adolescents With Anorexia Nervosa: Feasibility of Virtual Group Therapy.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Intertwined paths: exploring the link between oral diseases and eating disorders. A comprehensive narrative review.The British journal of nutrition · 2025Review
- Eating Disorders in Bangladesh: A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Disabilities and eating disorders: A theoretical model and call for research.Eating behaviors · 2025Review
- Trends and prevalence of eating disorders in children and adolescents.World journal of psychiatry · 2024Article
- Protocol for a randomized clinical trial to confirm the effectiveness of online guided self-help family-based treatment for adolescent anorexia nervosa.Contemporary clinical trials · 2024Article
- Clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and process evaluation of group schema therapy for eating disorders: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Caring for individuals with eating disorders-how to improve care while reducing unnecessary spending?PLOS mental health · 2024Article
- Intensive community and home-based treatments for eating disorders: a scoping review study protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Psychometric Examination of the Body, Eating, and Exercise Comparison Orientation Measure (BEECOM) among Spanish Adolescents and Young Adults.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Validation of sociocultural attitudes towards appearance questionnaire and its associations with body-related outcomes and eating disorders among Chinese adolescents.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Various Types of Virtual Reality-Based Therapy for Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- Cost-of-illness for non-underweight binge-eating disorders.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2022Article
- Eye movements and eating disorders: protocol for an exploratory experimental study examining the relationship in young-adult women with subclinical symptomatology.Journal of eating disorders · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVery little is known about the economic burden of eating disorders (ED) and related mental health comorbidities.
methodsUsing 5 years of data from the U.S. Medical Expenditures Panel Survey, we estimated the difference in annual health care costs, employment status, and earned income (2011 US$) between individuals with current ED compared to those without ED. We further estimated the contribution of mental health comorbidities to these disparities in health care costs, employment and earnings.
resultsIndividuals with ED had greater annual health care costs ($1869, p = 0.012), lower but borderline significant employment rates (OR = 0.67, 95% CIs [0.41, 1.09]), and lower but not statistically significant earnings among those who were employed ($2093, p = 0.48), compared to individuals without ED. Among individuals with ED, the presence of mental health comorbidities was associated with higher but not statistically significant health care costs ($1993, p = 0.17), lower borderline significant odds of employment (OR = 0.41, 95% CIs [0.14, 1.20]), and significantly lower earnings ($19,374, p < 0.01).
conclusionsTreatment and prevention of ED may have broader economic benefits in terms of heath care savings and gains in work productivity than previously recognized. This exploratory study justifies large scale evaluations of the societal economic impact of eating disorders and comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.