Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26843933›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2016

Context-dependent female preference for multiple ornaments in the bearded reedling.

Matteo Griggio, Herbert Hoi, Barbara Lukasch, Andrea Pilastro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matteo GriggioDipartimento di Biologia Università di Padova Via U. Bassi 58/B I-35131 Padova Italy.
Herbert HoiDepartment of Integrative Biology and Evolution Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology University of Veterinary Medicine of Vienna Savoyenstrasse 1/A A-1160 Vienna Austria.
Barbara LukaschDepartment of Integrative Biology and Evolution Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology University of Veterinary Medicine of Vienna Savoyenstrasse 1/A A-1160 Vienna Austria.
Andrea PilastroDipartimento di Biologia Università di Padova Via U. Bassi 58/B I-35131 Padova Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While it is well established that females prefer to mate with well-ornamented males, the influence of perceptive and cognitive processes on the expression of female mate choice is still poorly known. It has been suggested that the female perception of a male's attractiveness is not absolute, but depends on the other males with which he is compared that have been previously encountered (comparative evaluation). We investigated whether mate preference in bearded reedlings (Panurus biarmicus) is dependent on or independent of social context in relation to two different traits: beard and tail lengths. Each female had a choice between two to three males with different modifications of beard and tail. For each female, three different experiments were conducted (one binary and two trinary tests). We found that when females are presented with options that vary antagonistically with respect to two ornaments (binary test), some individuals prefer one trait while others the other trait. This indicates that in our bearded reedlings population exists a mate preference polymorphisms. Moreover, we found that the presence of a third stimulus, irrespective of the initial preference, reduced the strength of the initial preference - what we can call a "preference dilution effect." Our results suggest that the female's choice may be constrained by her cognitive abilities when she is simultaneously presented with several options varying for two uncorrelated traits.

Indexed as

Multiple traitsornamentspreference dilution effectsexual selection

Identifiers

PMID26843933
PMCPMC4729251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.