ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016
Goal-Directed Decision Making with Spiking Neurons.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laminar architecture of a decision circuit in the mouse orbitofrontal cortex.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- A neural circuit framework for economic choice: from building blocks of valuation to compositionality in multitasking.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Joint modeling of choices and reaction times based on Bayesian contextual behavioral control.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- The limits of personal experience.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Neuronal origins of reduced accuracy and biases in economic choices under sequential offers.eLife · 2022Article
- Optimism and pessimism in optimised replay.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- A generative spiking neural-network model of goal-directed behaviour and one-step planning.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Anatomic alterations across amygdala subnuclei in medication-free patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2020Article
- Neural mechanisms of economic choices in mice.eLife · 2020Article
- Functional Effects of Bilateral Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulation During Sequential Decision-Making: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study With Offline Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Economic Decisions through Circuit Inhibition.Current biology : CB · 2019Article
- Categorical encoding of decision variables in orbitofrontal cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Learning task-state representations.Nature neuroscience · 2019Review
- Habits without values.Psychological review · 2019Article
- A review of inflammatory mechanism in airway diseases.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2019Review
- A Closed-Loop Toolchain for Neural Network Simulations of Learning Autonomous Agents.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2019Article
- Neuromorphic Hardware Learns to Learn.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- A Survey of Robotics Control Based on Learning-Inspired Spiking Neural Networks.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2018Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Behavioral and neuroscientific data on reward-based decision making point to a fundamental distinction between habitual and goal-directed action selection. The formation of habits, which requires simple updating of cached values, has been studied in great detail, and the reward prediction error theory of dopamine function has enjoyed prominent success in accounting for its neural bases. In contrast, the neural circuit mechanisms of goal-directed decision making, requiring extended iterative computations to estimate values online, are still unknown. Here we present a spiking neural network that provably solves the difficult online value estimation problem underlying goal-directed decision making in a near-optimal way and reproduces behavioral as well as neurophysiological experimental data on tasks ranging from simple binary choice to sequential decision making. Our model uses local plasticity rules to learn the synaptic weights of a simple neural network to achieve optimal performance and solves one-step decision-making tasks, commonly considered in neuroeconomics, as well as more challenging sequential decision-making tasks within 1 s. These decision times, and their parametric dependence on task parameters, as well as the final choice probabilities match behavioral data, whereas the evolution of neural activities in the network closely mimics neural responses recorded in frontal cortices during the execution of such tasks. Our theory provides a principled framework to understand the neural underpinning of goal-directed decision making and makes novel predictions for sequential decision-making tasks with multiple rewards. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Goal-directed actions requiring prospective planning pervade decision making, but their circuit-level mechanisms remain elusive. We show how a model circuit of biologically realistic spiking neurons can solve this computationally challenging problem in a novel way. The synaptic weights of our network can be learned using local plasticity rules such that its dynamics devise a near-optimal plan of action. By systematically comparing our model results to experimental data, we show that it reproduces behavioral decision times and choice probabilities as well as neural responses in a rich set of tasks. Our results thus offer the first biologically realistic account for complex goal-directed decision making at a computational, algorithmic, and implementational level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.