Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26843601›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Weak signal amplification and detection by higher-order sensory neurons.

Sarah N Jung, Andre Longtin, Leonard Maler

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Nonresponsive Neurons Improve Population Coding of Object Location.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Synchronous spikes are necessary but not sufficient for a synchrony code in populations of spiking neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah N JungDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; and sarah_nicola.jung@uni-bielefeld.de.
Andre LongtinDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; and Brain and Mind Institute and Center for Neural Dynamics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Leonard MalerDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Brain and Mind Institute and Center for Neural Dynamics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 49510Canadian Institutes of Health Research 6027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory systems must extract behaviorally relevant information and therefore often exhibit a very high sensitivity. How the nervous system reaches such high sensitivity levels is an outstanding question in neuroscience. Weakly electric fish (Apteronotus leptorhynchus/albifrons) are an excellent model system to address this question because detailed background knowledge is available regarding their behavioral performance and its underlying neuronal substrate. Apteronotus use their electrosense to detect prey objects. Therefore, they must be able to detect electrical signals as low as 1 μV while using a sensory integration time of <200 ms. How these very weak signals are extracted and amplified by the nervous system is not yet understood. We studied the responses of cells in the early sensory processing areas, namely, the electroreceptor afferents (EAs) and pyramidal cells (PCs) of the electrosensory lobe (ELL), the first-order electrosensory processing area. In agreement with previous work we found that EAs cannot encode very weak signals with a spike count code. However, PCs can encode prey mimic signals by their firing rate, revealing a huge signal amplification between EAs and PCs and also suggesting differences in their stimulus encoding properties. Using a simple leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) model we predict that the target neurons of PCs in the midbrain torus semicircularis (TS) are able to detect very weak signals. In particular, TS neurons could do so by assuming biologically plausible convergence rates as well as very simple decoding strategies such as temporal integration, threshold crossing, and combining the inputs of PCs.

Indexed as

Membrane PotentialsModels, NeurologicalAnimalsBrainGymnotiformesPerceptionSensationSensory Receptor CellsStatic Electricitysensory processingweakly electric fishweak signal detection

Identifiers

PMID26843601
PMCPMC4869506
OpenAlexW2267403000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.