Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26843524›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2017

Mapping immune cell infiltration using restricted diffusion MRI.

Fang-Cheng Yeh, Li Liu, T Kevin Hitchens, Yijen L Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 138 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Creativity: a (white) matter of connectivity.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fang-Cheng YehDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Li LiuDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
T Kevin HitchensAnimal Imaging Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Yijen L WuRangos Research Center Animal Imaging Core, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

A MULTIDISCIPLINARY NMR CENTER FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCHP41EB001977 · NIBIB · MELLON PITTS CORPORATION (MPC CORP) · PI HO, CHIEN · 2003 to 2013
$12.5M
DEVELOPMENT OF MRI TO DETECT CARDIAC REJECTIONR01HL081349 · NHLBI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI HO, CHIEN · 2007 to 2010
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL081349NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB001977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDiffusion MRI provides a noninvasive way to assess tissue microstructure. Based on diffusion MRI, we propose a model-free method called restricted diffusion imaging (RDI) to quantify restricted diffusion and correlate it with cellularity. THEORY AND

methodsAn analytical relation between q-space signals and the density of restricted spins was derived to quantify restricted diffusion. A phantom study was conducted to investigate the performance of RDI, and RDI was applied to an animal study to assess immune cell infiltration in myocardial tissues with ischemia-reperfusion injury.

resultsOur phantom study showed a correlation coefficient of 0.998 between cell density and the restricted diffusion quantified by RDI. The animal study also showed that the high-value regions in RDI matched well with the macrophage infiltration areas in the H&E stained slides. In comparison with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), RDI exhibited its outperformance to detect macrophage infiltration and delineate inflammatory myocardium.

conclusionRDI can be used to reveal cell density and detect immune cell infiltration. RDI exhibits better specificity than the diffusivity measurement derived from DTI. Magn Reson Med 77:603-612, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell TrackingDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMacrophagesMaleMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryNeutrophil InfiltrationPhantoms, ImagingRatsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificityapparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)immune cell infiltrationischemia-reperfusion injuryrestricted diffusionrestricted diffusion imaging (RDI)

Identifiers

PMID26843524
PMCPMC8052951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.