Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26843487›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2016

Five-Antigen Fluorescent Bead-Based Assay for Diagnosis of Lyme Disease.

Monica E Embers, Nicole R Hasenkampf, Mary B Barnes, Elizabeth S Didier, Mario T Philipp, Amanda C Tardo

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Discovery and Surveillance of Tick-Borne Pathogens.Journal of medical entomology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Quantitative multiplexed strategies for human Lyme disease serological testing.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Monica E EmbersDivision of Bacteriology & Parasitology Tulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, Covington, Louisiana, USA members@tulane.edu.
Nicole R HasenkampfDivision of Bacteriology & Parasitology Tulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, Covington, Louisiana, USA.
Mary B BarnesDivision of Microbiology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, Covington, Louisiana, USA.
Elizabeth S DidierDivision of Microbiology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, Covington, Louisiana, USA.
Mario T PhilippDivision of Bacteriology & Parasitology Tulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, Covington, Louisiana, USA.
Amanda C TardoDivision of Bacteriology & Parasitology Tulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, Covington, Louisiana, USA.
Tulane University · US

Funding

Tulane NPRC SPF Sheltered Outdoor Enclosure ExpansionP51OD011104 · OD · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI L Lee HAMM · 2012 to 2026
$142.4M
A Multiplex Platform for Lyme Disease Diagnosis and Treatment ResponseR33AI100166 · NIAID · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI EMBERS, MONICA E · 2014 to 2016
$839k
A Multiplex Platform for Lyme Disease Diagnosis and Treatment ResponseR21AI100166 · NIAID · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI EMBERS, MONICA E · 2012 to 2013
$449k
NIAID NIH HHS 1R21AI100166-01NIAID NIH HHS 4R33AI100166-03NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI100166NIAID NIH HHS R33 AI100166NIH HHS P51 OD011104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The systematically difficult task of diagnosing Lyme disease can be simplified by sensitive and specific laboratory tests. The currently recommended two-tier test for serology is highly specific but falls short in sensitivity, especially in the early acute phase. We previously examined serially collected serum samples from Borrelia burgdorferi-infected rhesus macaques and defined a combination of antigens that could be utilized for detection of infection at all phases of disease in humans. The five B. burgdorferi antigens, consisting of OspC, OspA, DbpA, OppA2, and the C6 peptide, were combined into a fluorescent cytometric bead-based assay for the detection of B. burgdorferi antigen-specific IgG antibodies. Samples from Lyme disease patients and controls were used to determine the diagnostic value of this assay. Using this sample set, we found that our five-antigen multiplex IgG assay exhibited higher sensitivity (79.5%) than the enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (76.1%), the two-tier test (61.4%), and the C6 peptide enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (77.2%) while maintaining specificity over 90%. When detection of IgM was added to the bead-based assay, the sensitivity improved to 91%, but at a cost of reduced specificity (78%). These results indicate that the rational combination of antigens in our multiplex assay may offer an improved serodiagnostic test for Lyme disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBorrelia burgdorferiHumansImmunoassayImmunoglobulin GLyme DiseaseMacaca mulattaMaleSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID26843487
PMCPMC4820514
OpenAlexW2264373485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.