Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26843432›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2016

Myocardial function after polarizing versus depolarizing cardiac arrest with blood cardioplegia in a porcine model of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Terje Aass, Lodve Stangeland, Christian Arvei Moen, Pirjo-Riitta Salminen, Geir Olav Dahle, David J Chambers, Thomais Markou, Finn Eliassen, Malte Urban, Rune Haaverstad and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Myocardial energy metabolism and ultrastructure with polarizing and depolarizing cardioplegia in a porcine model.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Terje AassDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway terje.aass@helse-bergen.no.
Lodve StangelandFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Christian Arvei MoenDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Pirjo-Riitta SalminenDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Geir Olav DahleDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
David J ChambersCardiac Surgical Research, The Rayne Institute (King's College London), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Thomais MarkouCardiac Surgical Research, The Rayne Institute (King's College London), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Finn EliassenDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Malte UrbanDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Rune HaaverstadDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Knut MatreFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Ketil GrongFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Haukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPotassium-based depolarizing St Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solution No 2 administered as intermittent, oxygenated blood is considered as a gold standard for myocardial protection during cardiac surgery. However, the alternative concept of polarizing arrest may have beneficial protective effects. We hypothesize that polarized arrest with esmolol/adenosine/magnesium (St Thomas' Hospital Polarizing cardioplegic solution) in cold, intermittent oxygenated blood offers comparable myocardial protection in a clinically relevant animal model.

methodsTwenty anaesthetized young pigs, 42 ± 2 (standard deviation) kg on standardized tepid cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were randomized (10 per group) to depolarizing or polarizing cardiac arrest for 60 min with cardioplegia administered in the aortic root every 20 min as freshly mixed cold, intermittent, oxygenated blood. Global and local baseline and postoperative cardiac function 60, 120 and 180 min after myocardial reperfusion was evaluated with pressure-conductance catheter and strain by Tissue Doppler Imaging. Regional tissue blood flow, cleaved caspase-3 activity, GRK2 phosphorylation and mitochondrial function and ultrastructure were evaluated in myocardial tissue samples.

resultsLeft ventricular function and general haemodynamics did not differ between groups before CPB. Cardiac asystole was obtained and maintained during aortic cross-clamping. Compared with baseline, heart rate was increased and left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic pressures decreased in both groups after weaning. Cardiac index, systolic pressure and radial peak systolic strain did not differ between groups. Contractility, evaluated as dP/dtmax, gradually increased from 120 to 180 min after declamping in animals with polarizing cardioplegia and was significantly higher, 1871 ± 160 (standard error) mmHg/s, compared with standard potassium-based cardioplegic arrest, 1351 ± 70 mmHg/s, after 180 min of reperfusion (P = 0.008). Radial peak ejection strain rate increased and the load-independent variable preload recruitable stroke work was increased with polarizing cardioplegia after 180 min, 64 ± 3 vs 54 ± 2 mmHg (P = 0.018), indicating better preserved left ventricular contractility with polarizing cardioplegia. Phosphorylation of GRK2 in myocardial tissue did not differ between groups. Fractional cytoplasmic volume in myocytes was reduced in hearts arrested with polarizing cardioplegia, indicating reduction of cytoplasmic oedema.

conclusionsPolarizing oxygenated blood cardioplegia with esmolol/adenosine/magnesium offers comparable myocardial protection and improves contractility compared with the standard potassium-based depolarizing blood cardioplegia.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiopulmonary BypassDisease Models, AnimalHeart ArrestHeart Arrest, InducedSwineAnimal modelCardiac functionCardioplegiaMyocardial protection

Identifiers

PMID26843432
PMCPMC4913873
OpenAlexW2261032979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.