Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26843352›Full record

ArticleHemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis2016

The greatly misunderstood erythropoietin resistance index and the case for a new responsiveness measure.

Yossi Chait, Sahir Kalim, Joseph Horowitz, Christopher V Hollot, Elizabeth D Ankers, Michael J Germain, Ravi I Thadhani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Obesity may be erythropoietin dose-saving in hemodialysis patients.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yossi ChaitDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
Sahir KalimDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Joseph HorowitzDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
Christopher V HollotDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
Elizabeth D AnkersDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael J GermainBaystate Medical Center, Springfield, and Tufts University School of Medicine, MA, USA.
Ravi I ThadhaniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

The effects of protein carbamylation in end stage kidney diseaseK23DK106479 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KALIM, SAHIR · 2015 to 2019
$789k
The Engineering of Individualized Anemia Management ProtocolsK25DK096006 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI CHAIT, YOSSI · 2013 to 2016
$670k
Patient Oriented Studies of Vitamin D in Chronic Kidney DiseaseK24DK094872 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI THADHANI, RAVI · 2012 to 2016
$546k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK106479NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK094872NIDDK NIH HHS K25 DK096006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The optimal use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) to treat anemia in end stage renal disease remains controversial due to reported associations with adverse events. In analyzing these associations, studies often utilize ESA resistance indices (ERIs), to characterize a patient's response to ESA. In this study, we examine whether ERI is an adequate measure of ESA resistance. Methods We used retrospective data from a nonconcurrent cohort study of incident hemodialysis patients in the United States (n = 9386). ERI is defined as average weekly erythropoietin (EPO) dose per kg body weight (wt) per average hemoglobin (Hgb), over a 3-month period (ERI = (EPO/wt)/Hgb). Linear regression was used to demonstrate the relationship between ERI and weight-adjusted EPO. The coefficient of variation was used to compare the variability of Hgb with that of weight-adjusted EPO to explain this relationship. This analysis was done for each quarter during the first year of dialysis. Findings ERI is strongly linearly related with weight-adjusted EPO dose in each of the four quarters by the equation ERI = 0.0899*(EPO/wt) (range of R(2)  = 0.97-0.98) and weakly linearly related to 1/Hgb (range of R(2)  = 0.06-0.16). These correlations hold independent of age, sex, hgb level, ERI level, and epo-naïve stratifications. Discussion ERI is strongly linearly related to weight-adjusted (and nonweight-adjusted) EPO dose by a "universal," not patient-specific formula, and thus is a surrogate of EPO dose. Therefore, associations between ERI and clinical outcomes are associations between a confounded EPO dose and those outcomes.

Indexed as

AnemiaErythropoietinFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalRetrospective StudiesErythropoietinAnemiabiostatisticsmathematical models

Identifiers

PMID26843352
PMCPMC4934130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.