Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26843151›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2016

Dietary fat intake and reproductive hormone concentrations and ovulation in regularly menstruating women.

Sunni L Mumford, Jorge E Chavarro, Cuilin Zhang, Neil J Perkins, Lindsey A Sjaarda, Anna Z Pollack, Karen C Schliep, Kara A Michels, Shvetha M Zarek, Torie C Plowden and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Neighborhood disadvantage and fecundability in a cohort of US Black women.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sunni L MumfordDivision of Intramural Population Health Research and mumfords@mail.nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0133-3176
Jorge E ChavarroDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA;
Cuilin ZhangDivision of Intramural Population Health Research and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7446-4495
Neil J PerkinsDivision of Intramural Population Health Research and.
Lindsey A SjaardaDivision of Intramural Population Health Research and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0539-8110
Anna Z PollackDepartment of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA;ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4313-3298
Karen C SchliepDivision of Intramural Population Health Research and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1771-3157
Kara A MichelsDivision of Intramural Population Health Research and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2431-2079
Shvetha M ZarekDivision of Intramural Population Health Research and Program of Reproductive and Adult Endocrinology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD;ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2178-6623
Torie C PlowdenDivision of Intramural Population Health Research and Program of Reproductive and Adult Endocrinology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD;ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9086-2947
Rose G RadinDivision of Intramural Population Health Research and.
Lynne C MesserSchool of Community Health, Portland State University, Portland, OR.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7332-6170
Robyn A FrankelDivision of Intramural Population Health Research and.
Jean Wactawski-WendeDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; and.
Office of Extramural Research · USEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USGeorge Mason University · USHarvard University · USPortland State University · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Transgenic CoreP30DK046200 · NIDDK · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CORKEY, BARBARA E. · 1992 to 2021
$25.0M
Intramural NIH HHSNIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK046200NIDDK NIH HHS P30-DK46200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging evidence suggests potential links between some dietary fatty acids and improved fertility, because specific fatty acids may affect prostaglandin synthesis and steroidogenesis.

objectiveThe objective of this exploratory study was to evaluate associations between total and specific types of dietary fat intake and 1) hormone concentrations and 2) the risk of sporadic anovulation in a cohort of 259 regularly menstruating women in the BioCycle Study.

designEndogenous reproductive hormones were measured up to 8 times/cycle for up to 2 cycles, with visits scheduled with the use of fertility monitors. Dietary intake was assessed with up to four 24-h recalls/cycle. Linear mixed models and generalized linear models were used to evaluate the associations between dietary fatty acids and both reproductive hormone concentrations and ovulatory status. All models were adjusted for total energy intake, age, body mass index, and race.

resultsRelative to the lowest levels of percentage of energy from total fat, the highest tertile was associated with increased total and free testosterone concentrations (total: percentage change of 4.0%; 95% CI: 0.7%, 7.3%; free: percentage change of 4.1%; 95% CI: 0.5%, 7.7%). In particular, the percentage of energy from polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in the highest tertile was associated with increases in total and free testosterone (total: percentage change of 3.7%; 95% CI: 0.6%, 6.8%; free: percentage change of 4.0%; 95% CI: 0.5%, 7.5%). The PUFA docosapentaenoic acid (22:5n-3) was not significantly associated with testosterone concentrations (P-trend = 0.86 in energy substitution models) but was associated with increased progesterone and a reduced risk of anovulation (highest tertile compared with the lowest tertile: RR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.95). Fat intakes were not associated with other reproductive hormone concentrations.

conclusionsThese results indicate that total fat intake, and PUFA intake in particular, is associated with very small increases in testosterone concentrations in healthy women and that increased docosapentaenoic acid was associated with a lower risk of anovulation.

Indexed as

AnovulationDietAdultDietary FatsEnergy IntakeFatty Acids, UnsaturatedFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMenstrual CycleOvulationProgesteroneProspective StudiesReference ValuesRisk FactorsTestosteroneDietary Fatsdocosapentaenoic acidFatty Acids, UnsaturatedProgesteroneTestosteronedietary fatsestradiolmenstrual cycleovulationtestosterone

Identifiers

PMID26843151
PMCPMC4763493
OpenAlexW2259490539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.