Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26842897›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2017

[Patients with ICD-10 disorders F3 and F4 in psychiatric and psychosomatic in-patient units - who is treated where? : Allocation features from the PfAD study].

D Bichescu-Burian, C Cerisier, A Czekaj, J Grempler, S Hund, S Jaeger, P Schmid, G Weithmann, T Steinert

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03972787 (Effects of a Proactive Social Robot for Older Adults in Reducing Loneliness and Social Isolation), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03972787 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effects of a Proactive Social Robot for Older Adults in Reducing Loneliness and Social Isolation

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaycrestRan2019 to 2020Enrolled54ConditionsLoneliness, Mood, Quality of LifeArmsProactive social robot
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D Bichescu-BurianKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I, Universität Ulm/Zentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland. DanaMaria.BichescuBurian@zfp-zentrum.de.
C CerisierKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I, Universität Ulm/Zentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland.
A CzekajKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I, Universität Ulm/Zentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland.
J GremplerKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I, Universität Ulm/Zentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland.
S HundKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I, Universität Ulm/Zentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland.
S JaegerKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I, Universität Ulm/Zentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland.
P SchmidKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I, Universität Ulm/Zentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland.
G WeithmannKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I, Universität Ulm/Zentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland.
T SteinertKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I, Universität Ulm/Zentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland.
Zentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg · DEUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Germany, in-patient treatment of patients with depressive, neurotic, anxiety, and somatoform disorders (ICD-10 F3, F4) is carried out in different settings in psychiatry and psychosomatics. Which patient characteristics determine referral to one or the other specialty is a crucial question in mental health policy and is a matter of ongoing controversy. However, comparative data on patient populations are widely lacking.

methodsIn the study of Treatment Pathways of Patients with Anxiety and Depression (PfAD study), a total of 320 patients with ICD-10 F3/F4 clinical diagnoses were consecutively recruited from four treatment settings (psychiatric depression ward, psychiatric crisis intervention ward, psychiatric day hospitals, or psychosomatic hospital units; 80 participants per setting) and investigated.

resultsIn all treatment settings, patients with considerable severity of illness and chronicity were treated. Female gender, higher education, and higher income predicted referral to psychosomatic units; male gender, transfer from another hospital or emergency hospitalization, co-morbidity with a personality disorder, higher general psychiatric co-morbidity, and danger to self at admission predicted referral to psychiatric unit. Patients in psychosomatic units had neither more psychosomatic disorders nor more somatic problems. DISCUSSION: There is considerable overlap between the clientele of psychiatric and psychosomatic units. Referral and allocation appears to be determined by aspects of severity and social status.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnxietyDepressionEducational StatusGermanyHealth Care RationingHospitals, PsychiatricHumansIncomeInternational Classification of DiseasesMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionPsychosomatic MedicineReferral and ConsultationAnxietyDepressionPsychiatryPsychosomaticsReferral

Identifiers

PMID26842897
OpenAlexW2293209957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.