Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26842817›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016

Craniospinal irradiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide--a feasibility assessment of toxicity in patients with glioblastoma with a PNET component.

Ben O'Leary, Henry C Mandeville, Naomi Fersht, Francesca Solda, Julie Mycroft, Stergios Zacharoulis, Sucheta Vaidya, Frank Saran

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ben O'LearyThe Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Henry C MandevilleThe Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Naomi FershtDepartment of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2PG, UK.
Francesca SoldaDepartment of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2PG, UK.
Julie MycroftThe Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Stergios ZacharoulisThe Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Sucheta VaidyaThe Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Frank SaranThe Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JJ, UK. frank.saran@rmh.nhs.uk.
Royal Marsden Hospital · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no standard treatment for glioblastoma with elements of PNET (GBM-PNET). Conventional treatment for glioblastoma is surgery followed by focal radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide. Given the increased propensity for neuroaxial metastases seen with GBM-PNETs, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with temozolomide (TMZ) could be a feasible treatment option but little is known regarding its toxicity. The clinical records of all patients treated at two UK neuro-oncology centres with concurrent CSI and TMZ were examined for details of surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and toxicities related to the CSI-TMZ component of their treatment. Eight patients were treated with CSI-TMZ, the majority (6/8) for GBM-PNET. All patients completed radiotherapy to the craniospinal axis 35-40 Gy in 20-24 daily fractions with a focal boost to the tumour of 14-23.4 Gy in 8-13 daily fractions. Concurrent TMZ was administered at 75 mg/m(2) for seven of the cohort, with the other patient receiving 50 mg/m(2). The most commonly observed non-haematological toxicities were nausea and vomiting, with all patients experiencing at least grade 2 symptoms of either or both. All patients had at least grade 3 lymphopaenia. Two patients experience grade 4 neutropaenia and grade 3 thrombocytopaenia. Three of the eight patients required omission of TMZ for part of their chemoradiotherapy and 3/8 required hospital admission at some point during chemoradiotherapy. The addition of TMZ to CSI did not interrupt radiotherapy. Principal toxicities were neutropaenia, lymphopaenia, thrombocytopaenia, nausea and vomiting. Treatment with CSI-TMZ merits further investigation and may be suitable for patients with tumours at high-risk of metastatic spread throughout the CNS who have TMZ-sensitive pathologies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBrain NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyChemotherapy, AdjuvantChildCraniospinal IrradiationDacarbazineDose Fractionation, RadiationFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansLymphopeniaAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDacarbazineTemozolomideCraniospinal irradiationGBM-PNETGlioblastomaPNETTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID26842817
OpenAlexW2258830361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.