Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26842726›Full record

ArticleGenetica2016

Genetic diversity and conservation status of managed vicuña (Vicugna vicugna) populations in Argentina.

M Anello, M S Daverio, S R Romero, F Rigalt, M B Silbestro, L Vidal-Rioja, F Di Rocco

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Phylogeography and Population Genetics ofFrontiers in genetics · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M AnelloLaboratorio de Genética Molecular, Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Celular (IMBICE), CCT-CONICET-La Plata, CICPBA, Calle 526 e/10 y 11, PO Box 403, 1900, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina. manello@imbice.gov.ar.
M S DaverioLaboratorio de Genética Molecular, Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Celular (IMBICE), CCT-CONICET-La Plata, CICPBA, Calle 526 e/10 y 11, PO Box 403, 1900, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
S R RomeroINTA-Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Abra Pampa, Ruta Provincial 11 km 17 (4640), Cochinoca, Abra Pampa, Jujuy, Argentina.
F RigaltINTA-Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Catamarca, Ruta Provincial 33 km 4 (4705), Sumalao, Valle Viejo, Catamarca, Argentina.
M B SilbestroLaboratorio de Genética Molecular, Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Celular (IMBICE), CCT-CONICET-La Plata, CICPBA, Calle 526 e/10 y 11, PO Box 403, 1900, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
L Vidal-RiojaLaboratorio de Genética Molecular, Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Celular (IMBICE), CCT-CONICET-La Plata, CICPBA, Calle 526 e/10 y 11, PO Box 403, 1900, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
F Di RoccoLaboratorio de Genética Molecular, Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Celular (IMBICE), CCT-CONICET-La Plata, CICPBA, Calle 526 e/10 y 11, PO Box 403, 1900, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina. fdirocco@imbice.gov.ar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vicuña (Vicugna vicugna) was indiscriminately hunted for more than 400 years and, by the end of 1960s, it was seriously endangered. At that time, a captive breeding program was initiated in Argentina by the National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA) with the aim of preserving the species. Nowadays, vicuñas are managed in captivity and in the wild to obtain their valuable fiber. The current genetic status of Argentinean vicuña populations is virtually unknown. Using mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite markers, we assessed levels of genetic diversity of vicuña populations managed in the wild and compared it with a captive population from INTA. Furthermore, we examined levels of genetic structure and evidence for historical bottlenecks. Overall, all populations revealed high genetic variability with no signs of inbreeding. Levels of genetic diversity between captive and wild populations were not significantly different, although the captive population showed the lowest estimates of allelic richness, number of mitochondrial haplotypes, and haplotype diversity. Significant genetic differentiation at microsatellite markers was found between free-living populations from Jujuy and Catamarca provinces. Moreover, microsatellite data also revealed genetic structure within the Catamarca management area. Genetic signatures of past bottlenecks were detected in wild populations by the Garza Williamson test. Results from this study are discussed in relation to the conservation and management of the species.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationAllelesAnimalsArgentinaBayes TheoremBreedingCamelids, New WorldDNA, MitochondrialHaplotypesMicrosatellite RepeatsModels, GeneticDNA, MitochondrialBottlenecksConservationGenetic diversityMicrosatellitesMitochondrial DNASustainable useVicuña

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.