Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26842610›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2016

Stent treatment for basilar artery dissection: A single-center experience of 21 patients.

Li Li, Tianxiao Li, Jiangyu Xue, Ziliang Wang, Weixing Bai, Liangfu Zhu, Guang Feng, Gangqin Xu, Bowen Yang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Endovascular management of ruptured basilar artery dissection with two overlapping Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support stents.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li LiDepartment of Intervention, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China.
Tianxiao LiDepartment of Intervention, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China dr.litianxiao@vip.163.com.
Jiangyu XueDepartment of Intervention, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China.
Ziliang WangDepartment of Intervention, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China.
Weixing BaiDepartment of Intervention, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China.
Liangfu ZhuDepartment of Intervention, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China.
Guang FengDepartment of Intervention, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China.
Gangqin XuDepartment of Intervention, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China.
Bowen YangDepartment of Intervention, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China.
Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basilar artery dissection is a rare disease with high morbidity and mortality. No well-established management strategy exists for this lesion. Endovascular reconstructive therapy using stents (with or without coiling) may be the optimum strategy.We describe our center's experience for this treatment strategy in 21 patients with basilar artery dissection from January 2009 to July 2014 (17 men, four women; age range, 18-70 years; median age, 56 years). We divided patients into two groups: Group 1 patients received stent-assisted coiling treatment, and Group 2 patients received stent-only treatment. Pre-treatment, peri-operation and follow-up evaluation were investigated for complications, clinical outcome and angiographic results. The median follow-up time was 20 months (range, 3-67 months).All patients were treated endovascularly by stent-assisted coiling (14 patients) or stent only (seven patients). Immediate angiography showed: in Group 1, five of 14 lesions were completely occluded, five were partially occluded, four revealed retention of contrast media; in Group 2, all patients (seven of seven) had contrast retention. At the follow-up visit (median seven months, 3-29 months), the aneurysms were angiographically improved in five of 13 patients in Group 1 compared with immediately post-operation, while six of sevenimproved in Group 2. Five patients (all in Group 1) had ischemic or hemorrhage peri-operation complications. Long-term good clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) ≤ 2) were achieved in all patients except three death cases (two in Group1, one in Group 2).In our experience, endovascular reconstructive therapy using stents (with or without coiling) for basilar artery dissection is effective and safe. Stent-only treatment seems have a better safety profile during the peri-operation period.

Indexed as

Basilar ArteryStentsAdolescentAdultAgedAnticoagulantsAortic DissectionCerebral AngiographyEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsBasilar artery dissectionendovascularstent

Identifiers

PMID26842610
PMCPMC4984355
OpenAlexW2311961528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.