Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26842570›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016

The evolutionary convergence of mid-Mesozoic lacewings and Cenozoic butterflies.

Conrad C Labandeira, Qiang Yang, Jorge A Santiago-Blay, Carol L Hotton, Antónia Monteiro, Yong-Jie Wang, Yulia Goreva, ChungKun Shih, Sandra Siljeström, Tim R Rose and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Evolutionary implications of a deep-time perspective on insect pollination.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Conrad C LabandeiraCollege of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, People's Republic of China Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA Department of Entomology and BEES Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA rendong@mail.cnu.edu.cn.
Qiang YangCollege of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, People's Republic of China State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Dynamics and Conservation of Guangdong Higher Education Institute, College of Ecology and Evolution, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, People's Republic of China Geoscience Museum, Shijiazhuang University of Economics, Shijiazhuang 050031, People's Republic of China.
Jorge A Santiago-BlayDepartment of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA Department of Crop and Agroenvironmental Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, PR 00681, USA.
Carol L HottonDepartment of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA National Centre for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Antónia MonteiroDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore Yale-NUS College, Singapore 138614, Singapore.
Yong-Jie WangCollege of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, People's Republic of China.
Yulia GorevaDepartment of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
ChungKun ShihCollege of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, People's Republic of China Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA.
Sandra SiljeströmDepartment of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA Department of Chemistry, Materials and Surfaces, SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Borås 51115, Sweden Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC 20015, USA.
Tim R RoseDepartment of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA.
David L DilcherDepartments of Geology and Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Dong RenCollege of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, People's Republic of China labandec@si.edu.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mid-Mesozoic kalligrammatid lacewings (Neuroptera) entered the fossil record 165 million years ago (Ma) and disappeared 45 Ma later. Extant papilionoid butterflies (Lepidoptera) probably originated 80-70 Ma, long after kalligrammatids became extinct. Although poor preservation of kalligrammatid fossils previously prevented their detailed morphological and ecological characterization, we examine new, well-preserved, kalligrammatid fossils from Middle Jurassic and Early Cretaceous sites in northeastern China to unravel a surprising array of similar morphological and ecological features in these two, unrelated clades. We used polarized light and epifluorescence photography, SEM imaging, energy dispersive spectrometry and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry to examine kalligrammatid fossils and their environment. We mapped the evolution of specific traits onto a kalligrammatid phylogeny and discovered that these extinct lacewings convergently evolved wing eyespots that possibly contained melanin, and wing scales, elongate tubular proboscides, similar feeding styles, and seed-plant associations, similar to butterflies. Long-proboscid kalligrammatid lacewings lived in ecosystems with gymnosperm-insect relationships and likely accessed bennettitalean pollination drops and pollen. This system later was replaced by mid-Cretaceous angiosperms and their insect pollinators.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsButterfliesFossilsInsectaWings, AnimalangiospermsgymnospermsKalligrammatidaePapilionoideatubular probosciswing eyespots

Identifiers

PMID26842570
PMCPMC4760178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.