Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26842253›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2016

The Influence of Extrinsic Reinforcement on Children with Heavy Prenatal Alcohol Exposure.

Diana M Graham, Leila Glass, Sarah N Mattson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Prefrontal cortical responses in children with prenatal alcohol-related neurodevelopmental impairment: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diana M GrahamCenter for Behavioral Teratology, Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California.
Leila GlassCenter for Behavioral Teratology, Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California.
Sarah N MattsonCenter for Behavioral Teratology, Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California.
San Diego State University · US

Funding

FASD in San Diego and Moscow (U01 Research Project)U01AA014834 · NIAAA · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SARAH N MATTSON WELLER · 2003 to 2026
$12.4M
Mechanisms of Attention Deficits in Children with Heavy Prenatal Alcohol ExposureR01AA019605 · NIAAA · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MATTSON WELLER, SARAH N · 2010 to 2012
$1.1M
Mechanisms of Reading-Related Dysfunction in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum DisordersF31AA022261 · NIAAA · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GLASS, LEILA BETH · 2013 to 2015
$100k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA022261NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA019605NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA014834NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA01834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrenatal alcohol exposure affects inhibitory control and other aspects of attention and executive function. However, the efficacy of extrinsic reinforcement on these behaviors has not been tested.

methodsAlcohol-exposed children (AE; n = 34), children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; n = 23), and controls (CON; n = 31) completed a flanker task with 4 reward conditions (no reward, reward, reward+occasional response cost, equal probability of reward+response cost). Inhibitory control was tested in the no reward conditions using a 3(group) × 2(flanker type) ANCOVA. Response to reinforcement was tested using 3(group) × 4(reward condition) × 4(flanker type) analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Response time (RT) and accuracy were tested independently.

resultsGroups did not differ on demographic variables. The flanker task was successful in taxing interference control, an aspect of executive attention (i.e., responses to incongruent stimuli were slower than to congruent stimuli) and the AE group demonstrated impaired executive control over the other groups. Overall, the AE group had significantly slower RTs compared to the CON and ADHD groups, which did not differ. However, reinforcement improved RT in all groups. While occasional response cost had the greatest benefit in the CON group, the type of reinforcement did not differentially affect the AE and ADHD groups. Accuracy across reward conditions did not differ by group, but was dependent on flanker type and reward condition.

conclusionsAlcohol-exposed children, but not children with ADHD, had impaired interference control in comparison with controls, supporting a differential neurobehavioral profile in these 2 groups. Both clinical groups were equally affected by introduction of reinforcement, although the type of reinforcement did not differentially affect performance as it did in the control group, suggesting that reward or response cost could be used interchangeably to result in the same benefit.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCase-Control StudiesChildEthanolExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMalePregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsReaction TimeRewardEthanolAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity DisorderFetal Alcohol Spectrum DisordersFlankerInterference ControlResponse CostReward

Identifiers

PMID26842253
PMCPMC4962784
OpenAlexW2252609224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.