Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26842234›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2016

Of Mice and Melanoma: PDX System for Modeling Personalized Medicine.

Edward J Hartsough, Andrew E Aplin

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Edward J HartsoughDepartment of Cancer Biology and Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Andrew E AplinDepartment of Cancer Biology and Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Andrew.Aplin@Jefferson.edu.

Funding

Request for Supplemental Funds aligned to CA160495R01CA160495 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI APLIN, ANDREW ERIC · 2012 to 2022
$3.6M
Targeted therapies in mutant BRAF melanomaR01CA182635 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI APLIN, ANDREW ERIC · 2014 to 2024
$3.4M
Mutant BRAF-regulated transcription factors in melanoma progressionR01CA196278 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI APLIN, ANDREW ERIC · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
B-RAF Regulation of the Cell Cycle in MelanomaR01CA125103 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI APLIN, ANDREW ERIC · 2008 to 2013
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA160495NCI NIH HHS CA182635NCI NIH HHS CA196278NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125103NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160495NCI NIH HHS R01 CA182635NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted therapies have advanced the treatment options for cutaneous melanoma, but many patients will progress on drug. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) can be used to recapitulate therapy-resistant tumors. Furthermore, PDX modeling can be utilized in combination with targeted sequencing and phosphoproteomic platforms, providing preclinical basis for second-line targeted inhibitor strategies. See related article by Krepler et al., p. 1592.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAnimalsHeterograftsHumansMelanomaMiceTransplantation, Heterologous

Identifiers

PMID26842234
PMCPMC4818736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.