Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26842107›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Mirtazapine added to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for treatment-resistant depression in primary care (MIR trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Debbie Tallon, Nicola Wiles, John Campbell, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Chris Dickens, Una Macleod, Tim J Peters, Glyn Lewis, Ian M Anderson, Simon Gilbody and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pharmacological interventions for treatment-resistant depression in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Debbie TallonSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK. d.tallon@bristol.ac.uk.
Nicola WilesSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
John CampbellUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Smeall Building, Magdalen Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Carolyn Chew-GrahamResearch Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Chris DickensUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Room 1.04, College House, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Una MacleodHull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Tim J PetersSchool of Clinical Sciences, 69 St Michael's Hill, Bristol, BS2 8DZ, UK.
Glyn LewisUniversity College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Ian M AndersonNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, The University of Manchester, Room G809, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Simon GilbodyMental Health Research Group, Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, Alcuin College C Block, University of York, YO10 5DD, Heslington, UK.
William HollingworthSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Simon DaviesCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Room 6318, 80 Workman Way, Toronto, ON, Canada.
David KesslerSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBAt Bristol · GBCentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAHull York Medical School · GBKeele University · GBUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Department of Health 11/129/76Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with depression are usually managed in primary care and antidepressants are often the first-line treatment, but only one third of patients respond fully to a single antidepressant. This paper describes the protocol for a randomised controlled trial (MIR) to investigate the extent to which the addition of the antidepressant mirtazapine is effective in reducing the symptoms of depression compared with placebo in patients who are still depressed after they have been treated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) for at least 6 weeks in primary care. METHODS/

designMIR is a two-parallel group, multi-centre, pragmatic, placebo controlled, randomised trial with allocation at the level of the individual. Eligible participants are those who: are aged 18 years or older; are currently taking an SSRI/SNRI antidepressant (for at least 6 weeks at an adequate dose); score ≥ 14 on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II); have adhered to their medication; and meet ICD-10 criteria for depression (assessed using the Clinical Interview Schedule-Revised version). Participants who give written, informed consent, will be randomised to receive either oral mirtazapine or matched placebo, starting at 15 mg daily for 2 weeks and increasing to 30 mg daily thereafter, for up to 12 months (to be taken in addition to their usual antidepressant). Participants, their GPs, and the research team will all be blind to the allocation. The primary outcome will be depression symptoms at 12 weeks post randomisation, measured as a continuous variable using the BDI-II. Secondary outcomes (measured at 12, 24 and 52 weeks) include: response (reduction in depressive symptoms (BDI-II score) of at least 50% compared to baseline); remission of depression symptoms (BDI-II <10); change in anxiety symptoms; adverse effects; quality of life; adherence to antidepressant medication; health and social care use, time off work and cost-effectiveness. All outcomes will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. A qualitative study will explore patients' views and experiences of either taking two antidepressants, or an antidepressant and a placebo; and GPs' views on prescribing a second antidepressant in this patient group. DISCUSSION: The MIR trial will provide evidence on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of mirtazapine as an adjunct to SSRI/SNRI antidepressants for patients in primary care who have not responded to monotherapy.

trial registrationEudraCT Number: 2012-000090-23 (Registered January 2012); ISRCTN06653773 (Registered September 2012).

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsPrimary Health CareAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicDepressionDrug ResistanceHumansMianserinMirtazapineOutcome Assessment, Health CareQualitative ResearchSample SizeSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicMianserinMirtazapineSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID26842107
PMCPMC5526304
OpenAlexW2254646458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.