Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26842069›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2016

The effectiveness of workplace dietary interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sarah A Smith, Amelia A Lake, Carolyn Summerbell, Vera Araujo-Soares, Frances Hillier-Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Obesity in Older Type 2 Diabetic Patients: Does Working Environment Add Vulnerability?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah A SmithFuse, UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle, UK. sarah.smith@durham.ac.uk.
Amelia A LakeFuse, UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle, UK. amelia.lake@durham.ac.uk.
Carolyn SummerbellFuse, UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle, UK. carolyn.summerbell@durham.ac.uk.
Vera Araujo-SoaresFuse, UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle, UK. vera.araujo-soares@newcastle.ac.uk.
Frances Hillier-BrownFuse, UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle, UK. frances.hillier@durham.ac.uk.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKMedical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe lack of evidence of the role of workplaces as settings for behaviour change delivery and the failure to recognise and address the complexity of the work environment has been acknowledged. This systematic review and meta-analysis will identify the effectiveness of dietary interventions in the workplace facilitating an understanding of what works, why and how by identifying key components of and examining the theoretical models of behaviour change underpinning successful dietary interventions in the workplace. METHODS/

designWe will conduct searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL and PubMed for studies that assess dietary interventions based within workplace settings in any country, of any length of time or duration of follow-up. We will include all randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled trials (NRCTs), controlled before-after studies (CBAs) and interrupted time series (ITS) studies with a control group. Risk of bias of included studies will be assessed using a tool adapted from the Cochrane Public Health Review Group's recommended Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Meta-analysis will be conducted if appropriate, or a narrative synthesis will be conducted following the ESRC Narrative Synthesis Guidance. DISCUSSION: This paper outlines the study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis that will identify, critically appraise, and summarise the relevant evidence on the effectiveness and implications of interventions to promote healthier dietary behaviours in the workplace. This review will give an overview of the evidence and provide a guide for development of interventions promoting dietary behaviour change in workplaces. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015015175.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorDietFeeding BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID26842069
PMCPMC4740991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.