GuidelineDer Anaesthesist2016
[Recommendations of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine on structured patient handover in the perioperative phase : SBAR concept].
Guideline in Der Anaesthesist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serious Complications After Epidural Catheter Placement: Two Case Reports.Local and regional anesthesia · 2021Article
- [Transfer of a cockpit strategy to anesthesiology : Clinical example: introduction of canned decisions to solve cannot intubate cannot oxygenate situations].Der Anaesthesist · 2019Article
- Patient handover - the poor relation of medical training?GMS journal for medical education · 2019Article
- The satisfaction regarding handovers between ambulance and emergency department nurses: an observational study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2018Observational
- [Choosing wisely in anesthesia : An important step in quality optimization].Der Anaesthesist · 2017Article
- [Structured patient handovers in perioperative medicine : Rationale and implementation in clinical practice].Der Anaesthesist · 2017Review
- [Risk management in anesthesia and critical care medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2017Article
- [Aus "Fehler und Gefahren" wird "Patientensicherheit" und aus "Trends und Medizinökonomie" wird "Qualitätsmanagement und Medizinökonomie"].Der Anaesthesist · 2017Article
- [Risk management in anesthesia and critical care medicine].Der Anaesthesist · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Teamwork in the operating room and in the intensive care unit necessitates clear and precise communication; however, interruptions in communication frequently occur, especially in the perioperative phase. Patient are particularly susceptible to deficits in communication due to higher stress peaks, simultaneous admission of several patients and concomitant treatment of emergency cases etc. The German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) therefore recommends the implementation of the so-called SBAR concept (S: "situation", B: "background", A: "assessment", R: "recommendation") for standardization of patient handover. This concept was originally developed for high-risk areas and organizations with the aim of guaranteeing a rapid, effective and consistent transfer of information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26841942What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.