Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26841934›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Structure of the poly-C9 component of the complement membrane attack complex.

Natalya V Dudkina, Bradley A Spicer, Cyril F Reboul, Paul J Conroy, Natalya Lukoyanova, Hans Elmlund, Ruby H P Law, Susan M Ekkel, Stephanie C Kondos, Robert J A Goode and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The complement system in intestinal inflammation and cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exosomal-complement system activation in preeclampsia.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Natalya V DudkinaDepartment of Crystallography, Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck College, London WC1E 7HX, UK.
Bradley A SpicerARC Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging, Clayton Campus, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Cyril F ReboulARC Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging, Clayton Campus, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Paul J ConroyARC Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging, Clayton Campus, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Natalya LukoyanovaDepartment of Crystallography, Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck College, London WC1E 7HX, UK.
Hans ElmlundARC Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging, Clayton Campus, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Ruby H P LawARC Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging, Clayton Campus, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Susan M EkkelARC Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging, Clayton Campus, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Stephanie C KondosDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Clayton Campus, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Robert J A GoodeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Clayton Campus, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Georg RammARC Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging, Clayton Campus, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
James C WhisstockARC Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging, Clayton Campus, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Helen R SaibilDepartment of Crystallography, Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Birkbeck College, London WC1E 7HX, UK.
Michelle A DunstoneARC Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging, Clayton Campus, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L014211Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L014211/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 079605Wellcome Trust 086018Wellcome Trust 101488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The membrane attack complex (MAC)/perforin-like protein complement component 9 (C9) is the major component of the MAC, a multi-protein complex that forms pores in the membrane of target pathogens. In contrast to homologous proteins such as perforin and the cholesterol-dependent cytolysins (CDCs), all of which require the membrane for oligomerisation, C9 assembles directly onto the nascent MAC from solution. However, the molecular mechanism of MAC assembly remains to be understood. Here we present the 8 Å cryo-EM structure of a soluble form of the poly-C9 component of the MAC. These data reveal a 22-fold symmetrical arrangement of C9 molecules that yield an 88-strand pore-forming β-barrel. The N-terminal thrombospondin-1 (TSP1) domain forms an unexpectedly extensive part of the oligomerisation interface, thus likely facilitating solution-based assembly. These TSP1 interactions may also explain how additional C9 subunits can be recruited to the growing MAC subsequent to membrane insertion.

Indexed as

PolymersComplement C9Complement Membrane Attack ComplexCryoelectron MicroscopyHumansModels, MolecularMolecular StructureComplement C9Complement Membrane Attack ComplexPolymers

Identifiers

PMID26841934
PMCPMC4742998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.