ReviewStructure (London, England : 1993)2016
Safeguarding Structural Data Repositories against Bad Apples.
Review in Structure (London, England : 1993), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cat_Wiz: a stereochemistry-guided toolkit for locating, diagnosing, and annotating Mg2+ ions in RNA structures.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Duplicate entries in the Protein Data Bank: how to detect and handle them.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2025Article
- Principles of ion binding to RNA inferred from the analysis of a 1.55 Å resolution bacterial ribosome structure - Part I: Mg2.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Lone Pair…π Contacts and Structure Signatures of r(UNCG) Tetraloops, Z-Turns, and Z-Steps: A WebFR3D Survey.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- 'International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Ligand-centered assessment of SARS-CoV-2 drug target models in the Protein Data Bank.The FEBS journal · 2020Article
- On the evolution of the quality of macromolecular models in the PDB.The FEBS journal · 2020Article
- Molstack: A platform for interactive presentations of electron density and cryo-EM maps and their interpretations.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2020Article
- Nucleobase carbonyl groups are poor MgRNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- Critical evaluation of bioinformatics tools for the prediction of protein crystallization propensity.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018Review
- A close look onto structural models and primary ligands of metallo-β-lactamases.Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy · 2018Review
- Detect, correct, retract: How to manage incorrect structural models.The FEBS journal · 2018Review
- Refining the macromolecular model - achieving the best agreement with the data from X-ray diffraction experiment.Crystallography reviews · 2018Article
- Molstack-Interactive visualization tool for presentation, interpretation, and validation of macromolecules and electron density maps.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018Article
- The science is in the data.IUCrJ · 2017Review
- New developments in crystallography: exploring its technology, methods and scope in the molecular biosciences.Bioscience reports · 2017Review
- Twilight reloaded: the peptide experience.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2017Article
- Mg2+ ions: do they bind to nucleobase nitrogens?Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Raw diffraction data preservation and reuse: overview, update on practicalities and metadata requirements.IUCrJ · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural biology research generates large amounts of data, some deposited in public databases or repositories, but a substantial remainder never becomes available to the scientific community. In addition, some of the deposited data contain less or more serious errors that may bias the results of data mining. Thorough analysis and discussion of these problems is needed to ameliorate this situation. This perspective is an attempt to propose some solutions and encourage both further discussion and action on the part of the relevant organizations, in particular the PDB and various bodies of the International Union of Crystallography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.