Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26840260›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2016

CD133 expression may be useful as a prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer, a tool for optimizing therapy and supportive evidence for the cancer stem cell hypothesis: a meta-analysis.

Yang Zhao, Jing Peng, Enlong Zhang, Ning Jiang, Jiang Li, Qi Zhang, Xuening Zhang, Yuanjie Niu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Can CD133 Be Regarded as a Prognostic Biomarker in Oncology: Pros and Cons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yang ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China.
Jing PengDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China.
Enlong ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China.
Ning JiangSex Hormone Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Urology, Tianjin 300211, China.
Jiang LiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China.
Qi ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China.
Xuening ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China.
Yuanjie NiuSex Hormone Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Urology, Tianjin 300211, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed a meta-analysis of CD133-related clinical data to investigate the role of cancer stem cells (CSCs) in the clinical outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, analyzing the effectiveness of various therapeutic strategies and examining the validity of the CSC hypothesis. For 28 studies (4546 patients), the relative risk (RR) to survival outcomes associated with CD133+ CRCs were calculated using STATA 12.0 software. Pooled results showed that CD133High patients had poor 5-year overall survival (RR 0.713, 95% CI 0·616-0·826) and 5-year disease free survival (RR 0·707, 95% CI 0·602-0·831). Both associations were consistently observed across different races, research techniques and therapeutic strategies. In a subgroup receiving adjuvant therapy, CD133Low patients achieved significantly better survival than CD133High patients. The findings suggest that CD133 could serve as a predictive marker of poor prognosis and treatment failure in CRC. CD133Low patients could benefit from adjuvant treatments, while CD133High patients should be given novel treatments besides adjuvant therapy. Our results also provide evidence in support of the CSC hypothesis.

Indexed as

AC133 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateNeoplastic Stem CellsPrognosisReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionAC133 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorPROM1 protein, humancancer stem cellCD133meta-analysistumor genesistumor recurrence

Identifiers

PMID26840260
PMCPMC4891101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.