Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26839965›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2016

Transcriptome Analysis of Targeted Mouse Mutations Reveals the Topography of Local Changes in Gene Expression.

David B West, Eric K Engelhard, Michael Adkisson, A J Nava, Julia V Kirov, Andreanna Cipollone, Brandon Willis, Jared Rapp, Pieter J de Jong, Kent C Lloyd

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. PtdIns(3,5)PNature · 2026
    Article
  3. Loss of Function of theCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  4. PtdIns(3,5)PbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. TheBiomolecules · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genetic and Molecular Quality Control of Genetically Engineered Mice.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Importing genetically altered animals: ensuring quality.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David B WestChildren's Hospital Oakland Research Institute (CHORI), Oakland, California, United States of America.
Eric K EngelhardMouse Biology Program, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Michael AdkissonChildren's Hospital Oakland Research Institute (CHORI), Oakland, California, United States of America.
A J NavaChildren's Hospital Oakland Research Institute (CHORI), Oakland, California, United States of America.
Julia V KirovChildren's Hospital Oakland Research Institute (CHORI), Oakland, California, United States of America.
Andreanna CipolloneMouse Biology Program, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Brandon WillisMouse Biology Program, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Jared RappMouse Biology Program, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Pieter J de JongChildren's Hospital Oakland Research Institute (CHORI), Oakland, California, United States of America.
Kent C LloydMouse Biology Program, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

KOMP2-Phase3 Production and Phenotyping by the DTCC Consortium TCP Transfer to UC DavisUM1OD023221 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KC KENT LLOYD · 2016 to 2026
$45.7M
High-throughput targeted mutagenesis of mouse stem cell linesU01HG004080 · NHGRI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RES CTR AT OAKLAND · PI DE JONG, PIETER J. · 2006 to 2010
$28.1M
KOMP Phase II Mouse Production and CryopreservationU42OD011175 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LLOYD, KC KENT · 2012 to 2015
$18.9M
KOMP Phase II Mouse PhenotypingU54HG006364 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LLOYD, KC KENT · 2011 to 2015
$16.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004080NHGRI NIH HHS U01HG004080NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG006364NHGRI NIH HHS U54HG006364NIH HHS U42 OD011175NIH HHS U42OD011175NIH HHS UM1 OD023221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unintended consequences of gene targeting in mouse models have not been thoroughly studied and a more systematic analysis is needed to understand the frequency and characteristics of off-target effects. Using RNA-seq, we evaluated targeted and neighboring gene expression in tissues from 44 homozygous mutants compared with C57BL/6N control mice. Two allele types were evaluated: 15 targeted trap mutations (TRAP); and 29 deletion alleles (DEL), usually a deletion between the translational start and the 3' UTR. Both targeting strategies insert a bacterial beta-galactosidase reporter (LacZ) and a neomycin resistance selection cassette. Evaluating transcription of genes in +/- 500 kb of flanking DNA around the targeted gene, we found up-regulated genes more frequently around DEL compared with TRAP alleles, however the frequency of alleles with local down-regulated genes flanking DEL and TRAP targets was similar. Down-regulated genes around both DEL and TRAP targets were found at a higher frequency than expected from a genome-wide survey. However, only around DEL targets were up-regulated genes found with a significantly higher frequency compared with genome-wide sampling. Transcriptome analysis confirms targeting in 97% of DEL alleles, but in only 47% of TRAP alleles probably due to non-functional splice variants, and some splicing around the gene trap. Local effects on gene expression are likely due to a number of factors including compensatory regulation, loss or disruption of intragenic regulatory elements, the exogenous promoter in the neo selection cassette, removal of insulating DNA in the DEL mutants, and local silencing due to disruption of normal chromatin organization or presence of exogenous DNA. An understanding of local position effects is important for understanding and interpreting any phenotype attributed to targeted gene mutations, or to spontaneous indels.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGene TargetingAnimalsDown-RegulationGene DeletionGene Expression ProfilingGene LibraryGenomeHomozygoteMice, Inbred C57BLMutationUp-Regulation

Identifiers

PMID26839965
PMCPMC4739719
OpenAlexW2256109864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.