Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26839681›Full record

ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2016

Vaccine hesitancy: understanding better to address better.

Dewesh Kumar, Rahul Chandra, Medha Mathur, Saurabh Samdariya, Neelesh Kapoor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
132citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

132 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dewesh KumarDepartment of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Basni-II, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342005 India.
Rahul ChandraDepartment of Community Medicine, Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Bareilly, U.P, 243006 India.
Medha MathurDepartment of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Basni-II, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342005 India.
Saurabh SamdariyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Basni-II, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342005 India.
Neelesh KapoorRMNCH + A Scale up project, IPE Global/USAID, Sixth Floor, DSHM, B block, Vikas Bhawan-2, Civil Lines, New Delhi, 110054 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is an emerging term in the socio-medical literature which describes an approach to vaccine decision making. It recognizes that there is a continuum between full acceptance and outright refusal of some or all vaccines and challenges the previous understanding of individuals or groups, as being either anti-vaccine or pro-vaccine. The behaviours responsible for vaccine hesitancy can be related to confidence, convenience and complacency. The causes of vaccine hesitancy can be described by the epidemiological triad i.e. the complex interaction of environmental- (i.e. external), agent- (i.e. vaccine) and host (or parent)- specific factors. Vaccine hesitancy is a complex and dynamic issue; future vaccination programs need to reflect and address these context-specific factors in both their design and evaluation. Many experts are of the view that it is best to counter vaccine hesitancy at the population level. They believe that it can be done by introducing more transparency into policy decision-making before immunization programs, providing up-to-date information to the public and health providers about the rigorous procedures undertaken before introduction of new vaccines, and through diversified post-marketing surveillance of vaccine-related events.

Indexed as

VaccinationVaccine confidenceVaccine decision makingVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID26839681
PMCPMC4736490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.