ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2016
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection from a Western perspective: Today's promises and future challenges.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer based on histologic images by artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Review
- The current state of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the UK: a nationwide cross-sectional survey.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Design of Transmission Tubes for Surgical Concentric Push-Pull Robots.... International Symposium on Medical Robotics. International Symposium on Medical Robotics · 2024Article
- Rectal neuroendocrine tumours and the role of emerging endoscopic techniques.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023Review
- Task Deconstruction of Colonic Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (cESD): An Expert Consensus.World journal of surgery · 2020Article
- Modular laser-based endoluminal ablation of the gastrointestinal tract: in vivo dose-effect evaluation and predictive numerical model.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Immunohistochemical evaluation of tumor budding for stratifying T1 colorectal cancer: optimal cut-off value and a novel computer-assisted semiautomatic method.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019Article
- Article
- Management of complex polyps of the colon and rectum.International journal of colorectal disease · 2018Review
- Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal polyps and selected malignant tumors: caution concerning intermediate-term functional results.International journal of colorectal disease · 2017Article
- Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: patient selection and special considerations.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2017Review
- Stiff yet Bendy: Tubular Transmissions for Driving Surgical Robots through Flexible Endoscopes.Journal of medical robotics researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last few years, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has shown to be effective in the management of early colorectal neoplasms, particularly in Asian countries where the technique was born. In the Western world, its implementation has been slow and laborious. In this paper, the indications for ESD, its learning model, the available methods to predict the presence of deep submucosal invasion before the procedure and the published outcomes from Asia and Europe will be reviewed. Since ESD has several limitations in terms of learning achievement in the West, and completion of the procedure for the first cases is difficult in our part of the world, a short review on colorectal assisted ESD has been included. Finally, other endoscopic and surgical treatment modalities that are in competition with colorectal ESD will be summarized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.