Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26839591›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2016

Succinic acid production on xylose-enriched biorefinery streams by Actinobacillus succinogenes in batch fermentation.

Davinia Salvachúa, Ali Mohagheghi, Holly Smith, Michael F A Bradfield, Willie Nicol, Brenna A Black, Mary J Biddy, Nancy Dowe, Gregg T Beckham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Metabolic engineering ofBiotechnology for biofuels · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Continuous succinic acid fermentation byBiotechnology for biofuels · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Davinia Salvachúa *National Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
Ali Mohagheghi *National Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
Holly SmithNational Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
Michael F A BradfieldDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Willie NicolDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Brenna A BlackNational Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
Mary J BiddyNational Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
Nancy DoweNational Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
Gregg T BeckhamNational Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory · USUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCo-production of chemicals from lignocellulosic biomass alongside fuels holds promise for improving the economic outlook of integrated biorefineries. In current biochemical conversion processes that use thermochemical pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis, fractionation of hemicellulose-derived and cellulose-derived sugar streams is possible using hydrothermal or dilute acid pretreatment (DAP), which then offers a route to parallel trains for fuel and chemical production from xylose- and glucose-enriched streams. Succinic acid (SA) is a co-product of particular interest in biorefineries because it could potentially displace petroleum-derived chemicals and polymer precursors for myriad applications. However, SA production from biomass-derived hydrolysates has not yet been fully explored or developed.

resultsHere, we employ Actinobacillus succinogenes 130Z to produce succinate in batch fermentations from various substrates including (1) pure sugars to quantify substrate inhibition, (2) from mock hydrolysates similar to those from DAP containing single putative inhibitors, and (3) using the hydrolysate derived from two pilot-scale pretreatments: first, a mild alkaline wash (deacetylation) followed by DAP, and secondly a single DAP step, both with corn stover. These latter streams are both rich in xylose and contain different levels of inhibitors such as acetate, sugar dehydration products (furfural, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural), and lignin-derived products (ferulate, p-coumarate). In batch fermentations, we quantify succinate and co-product (acetate and formate) titers as well as succinate yields and productivities. We demonstrate yields of 0.74 g succinate/g sugars and 42.8 g/L succinate from deacetylated DAP hydrolysate, achieving maximum productivities of up to 1.27 g/L-h. Moreover, A. succinogenes is shown to detoxify furfural via reduction to furfuryl alcohol, although an initial lag in succinate production is observed when furans are present. Acetate seems to be the main inhibitor for this bacterium present in biomass hydrolysates.

conclusionOverall, these results demonstrate that biomass-derived, xylose-enriched hydrolysates result in similar yields and titers but lower productivities compared to clean sugar streams, which can likely be improved via fermentation process developments and metabolic engineering. Overall, this study comprehensively examines the behavior of A. succinogenes on xylose-enriched hydrolysates on an industrially relevant, lignocellulosic feedstock, which will pave the way for future work toward eventual SA production in an integrated biorefinery.

Indexed as

Actinobacillus succinogenesBiochemicalsBiofuelsBiorefineryFermentationPretreatmentSuccinic acid

Identifiers

PMID26839591
PMCPMC4736274
OpenAlexW2266577790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.