ReviewHuman genetics2016
Improved prediction of complex diseases by common genetic markers: state of the art and further perspectives.
Review in Human genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells co-infusion in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Pooled it
- Serum elemental profile-based machine learning models for Alzheimer's disease identification and cognitive score prediction.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2026Article
- Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Post-Myocardial Infarction Outcomes: Influence of Renal Function and Its Modulation by Klotho.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- A holistic view on disease-modifying aspects, comorbidities, and contemporary neuroprotective approaches.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2025Article
- Ge-SAND: an explainable deep learning-driven framework for disease risk prediction by uncovering complex genetic interactions in parallel.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Neurodegeneration in acute and chronic central nervous system disorders: Novel ideas and approaches.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2024Article
- Psychosomatic Aspects of The Development of Comorbid Pathology: A Review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2022Review
- Project DyAdd: Non-linguistic Theories of Dyslexia Predict Intelligence.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Pinyin Is an Effective Proxy for Early Screening for Mandarin-Speaking Children at Risk of Reading Disorders.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Polygenic Risk Score for Early Prediction of Sepsis Risk in the Polytrauma Screening Cohort.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Statistical learning approaches in the genetic epidemiology of complex diseases.Human genetics · 2020Review
- Monogenic, Polygenic, and MicroRNA Markers for Ischemic Stroke.Molecular neurobiology · 2019Review
- Learning from Longitudinal Data in Electronic Health Record and Genetic Data to Improve Cardiovascular Event Prediction.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Classification based on extensions of LS-PLS using logistic regression: application to clinical and multiple genomic data.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Article
- Functional annotation of sixty-five type-2 diabetes risk SNPs and its application in risk prediction.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Pattern recognition for predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine in cancer.The EPMA journal · 2017Review
- Risk Model for Colorectal Cancer in Spanish Population Using Environmental and Genetic Factors: Results from the MCC-Spain study.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- A Prediction Algorithm for Drug Response in Patients with Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Based on Clinical and Genetic Information.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable risk assessment of frequent, but treatable diseases and disorders has considerable clinical and socio-economic relevance. However, as these conditions usually originate from a complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors, precise prediction remains a considerable challenge. The current progress in genotyping technology has resulted in a substantial increase of knowledge regarding the genetic basis of such diseases and disorders. Consequently, common genetic risk variants are increasingly being included in epidemiological models to improve risk prediction. This work reviews recent high-quality publications targeting the prediction of common complex diseases. To be included in this review, articles had to report both, numerical measures of prediction performance based on traditional (non-genetic) risk factors, as well as measures of prediction performance when adding common genetic variants to the model. Systematic PubMed-based search finally identified 55 eligible studies. These studies were compared with respect to the chosen approach and methodology as well as results and clinical impact. Phenotypes analysed included tumours, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular diseases. All studies applied one or more statistical measures reporting on calibration, discrimination, or reclassification to quantify the benefit of including SNPs, but differed substantially regarding the methodological details that were reported. Several examples for improved risk assessments by considering disease-related SNPs were identified. Although the add-on benefit of including SNP genotyping data was mostly moderate, the strategy can be of clinical relevance and may, when being paralleled by an even deeper understanding of disease-related genetics, further explain the development of enhanced predictive and diagnostic strategies for complex diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.