Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26838955›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2016

Errors in imaging patients in the emergency setting.

Antonio Pinto, Alfonso Reginelli, Fabio Pinto, Giuseppe Lo Re, Federico Midiri, Carlo Muzj, Luigia Romano, Luca Brunese

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact of discrepancies in radiological interpretation on forensic report outcomes: A retrospective study.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Antonio Pinto1 Department of Radiology, Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Alfonso Reginelli2 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Surgery F Magrassi-A. Lanzara, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Fabio Pinto3 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Marcianise Hospital, ASL Caserta (CE), Caserta, Italy.
Giuseppe Lo Re4 Section of Radiological Sciences, DIBIMED, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Federico Midiri4 Section of Radiological Sciences, DIBIMED, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Carlo Muzj1 Department of Radiology, Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Luigia Romano1 Department of Radiology, Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Luca Brunese5 Department of Health Science, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency and trauma care produces a "perfect storm" for radiological errors: uncooperative patients, inadequate histories, time-critical decisions, concurrent tasks and often junior personnel working after hours in busy emergency departments. The main cause of diagnostic errors in the emergency department is the failure to correctly interpret radiographs, and the majority of diagnoses missed on radiographs are fractures. Missed diagnoses potentially have important consequences for patients, clinicians and radiologists. Radiologists play a pivotal role in the diagnostic assessment of polytrauma patients and of patients with non-traumatic craniothoracoabdominal emergencies, and key elements to reduce errors in the emergency setting are knowledge, experience and the correct application of imaging protocols. This article aims to highlight the definition and classification of errors in radiology, the causes of errors in emergency radiology and the spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiography, ultrasonography and CT in the emergency setting.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ErrorsDiagnostic ImagingEmergency Service, HospitalHumans

Identifiers

PMID26838955
PMCPMC4985468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.