Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26838954›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016

Prospective evaluation of free-breathing diffusion-weighted imaging for the detection of inflammatory bowel disease with MR enterography in childhood population.

Céline Dubron, Freddy Avni, Nathalie Boutry, Dominique Turck, Alain Duhamel, Elisa Amzallag-Bellenger

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Motion Mitigation Techniques for Abdominal and Cardiac MR Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Céline Dubron1 Department of Pediatric Radiology, Hospital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU Lille, Lille Cedex, France.
Freddy Avni1 Department of Pediatric Radiology, Hospital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU Lille, Lille Cedex, France.
Nathalie Boutry1 Department of Pediatric Radiology, Hospital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU Lille, Lille Cedex, France.
Dominique Turck2 Department of Pediatric Gastrology, Hospital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU Lille, Lille Cedex, France.
Alain Duhamel3 Department of Statistics, CHRU Lille, Lille Cedex, France.
Elisa Amzallag-Bellenger1 Department of Pediatric Radiology, Hospital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU Lille, Lille Cedex, France.
Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate prospectively the performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for the detection of active lesions on MR enterography (MRE) in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

methodsMRE of 48 children (mean age 13 years) with suspected or known IBD were blindly analysed by 2 independent readers for the presence of active lesions. Two sets of imaging including DWI and gadolinium-enhanced imaging (GEI) were reviewed. A reader consensus was obtained. The gold standard was histopathological findings. In patient-level analysis and segment-level analysis, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for DWI and GEI and compared using McNemar's test or logistic random-effects models.

resultsAt least 1 active lesion was confirmed in 42 (87.5%) children. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of at least one lesion were 88.1% (95% CI, 74.3-96.1) and 83.3% (95% CI, 35.9-99.6), respectively, for DWI and 66.7% (95% CI, 50.4-80.4) and 83.3% (95% CI, 35.9-99.6), respectively, for GEI. In segment-level analysis, sensitivity and specificity for the detection of specific segment lesions were 62.5% (95% CI, 48.1-75) and 97.1% (95% CI, 93.5-98.7), respectively, for DWI and 45.7% (95% CI, 30.8-61.3) and 98.2% (95% CI, 95.3-99.4), respectively, for GEI. The sensitivity of DWI was significantly better than that of GEI per patient (p = 0.004) and per segment (p = 0.028).

conclusionDWI demonstrates better performance than GEI for the detection of active lesions in children with IBD. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Examination with no intravenous injection-DWI can replace T1 weighted images when paediatric patients are screened with MRE for IBD. Examination performed in free breathing is better tolerated by children.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildColitis, UlcerativeContrast MediaCrohn DiseaseDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleGadoliniumHumansMaleProspective StudiesRespirationContrast MediaGadolinium

Identifiers

PMID26838954
PMCPMC4846210
OpenAlexW2257480599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.