Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26838953›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in the combined modality treatment of anal cancer patients.

Pierfrancesco Franco, Francesca Arcadipane, Riccardo Ragona, Massimiliano Mistrangelo, Paola Cassoni, Fernando Munoz, Nadia Rondi, Mario Morino, Patrizia Racca, Umberto Ricardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimising chemoradiotherapy in anal cancer.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026
    Review
  2. Recent Advances in the Management of Anal Cancer.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. IncorporatingBMC cancer · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pierfrancesco Franco1 Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Francesca Arcadipane1 Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Riccardo Ragona1 Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Massimiliano Mistrangelo2 Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Paola Cassoni3 Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Fernando Munoz4 Department of Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy, Radiation Oncology, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Nadia Rondi4 Department of Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy, Radiation Oncology, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Mario Morino2 Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Patrizia Racca5 Oncological Centre for Gastrointestinal Neoplasm, Medical Oncology 1, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Umberto Ricardi1 Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report clinical and dosimetric outcomes of a consecutive series of patients with anal cancer treated with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) concomitant to chemotherapy (CT).

methodsA cohort of 39 patients underwent VMAT employing a schedule consisting of 50.4 Gy/28 fractions to the gross tumour volume (GTV) and 42 Gy/28 fractions to the elective nodal volumes for patients with cT2N0 disease. Patients with cT3-T4/N0-N3 tumours were prescribed 54 Gy/30 fractions to the GTV and 50.4 Gy/30 fractions to the gross nodal volumes if sized ≤3 cm or 54 Gy/30 fractions if > 3 cm. Elective nodal regions were given 45 Gy/30 fractions. CT was administered concurrently following Nigro's regimen. The primary end point was acute toxicity. Secondary end points were colostomy-free survival (CFS), disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Dosimetric data are also provided.

resultsMedian follow-up was 21 months. Maximum acute toxicities were: dermatologic-G3: 18%; gastrointestinal-G3: 5%; genitourinary-G3: 2%; anaemia-G2: 7%; leukopenia-G3: 28%; G4: 8%; neutropenia-G3: 13%; G4: 18%; thrombocytopenia-G3: 11%; and G4: 2%. The actuarial 2-year CFS was 77.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 54-90.4%]. Actuarial 2-year OS and CSS were 85.2% (95% CI: 60.1-95.1%), while DFS was 75.1% (95% CI: 52.4.7-88.1%).

conclusionOur clinical results support the use of VMAT as a safe and effective intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) option in the combined modality treatment of anal cancer, with consistent dosimetry, mild toxicity and promising sphincter preservation and survival rates. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: IMRT is a standard of care for patients with anal cancer, and VMAT is a robust technical solution in this setting.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnus NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated

Identifiers

PMID26838953
PMCPMC4846209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.