Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26838932›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Presynaptic partner selection during retinal circuit reassembly varies with timing of neuronal regeneration in vivo.

Takeshi Yoshimatsu, Florence D D'Orazi, Clare R Gamlin, Sachihiro C Suzuki, Arminda Suli, David Kimelman, David W Raible, Rachel O Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Retinal Cone Mosaic in sws1-Mutant Medaka (Oryzias latipes), A Teleost.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Retina regeneration: lessons from vertebrates.Oxford open neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. 4-Dimensional Imaging of Zebrafish Optic Cup Morphogenesis.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Takeshi YoshimatsuDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 357420, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Florence D D'OraziDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 357420, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Clare R GamlinDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 357420, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Sachihiro C SuzukiDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 357420, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Arminda SuliDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 357420, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
David KimelmanDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific Street, Box 357350, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
David W RaibleDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 357420, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Rachel O WongDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 357420, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.

Funding

Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAUREEN E NEITZ · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
Genetics of Zebrafish Hair Cell ToxicityR01DC005987 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 2003 to 2023
$9.8M
INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGYT32HD007183 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 1985 to 2015
$5.7M
In Vivo Analysis of the Developing Vertebrate RetinaR01EY014358 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WONG, RACHEL O · 2003 to 2016
$4.3M
Regulation of Mesodermal Progenitors in Transgenic ZebrafishR01GM079203 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KIMELMAN, DAVID · 2008 to 2020
$4.0M
Screens for modulators of hair cell regenerationR01DC011269 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS EY01730NEI NIH HHS EY14358NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014358NICHD NIH HHS HD07183NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007183NIDCD NIH HHS DC011269NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005987NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011269NIGMS NIH HHS GM079203NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether neurons can restore their original connectivity patterns during circuit repair is unclear. Taking advantage of the regenerative capacity of zebrafish retina, we show here the remarkable specificity by which surviving neurons reassemble their connectivity upon regeneration of their major input. H3 horizontal cells (HCs) normally avoid red and green cones, and prefer ultraviolet over blue cones. Upon ablation of the major (ultraviolet) input, H3 HCs do not immediately increase connectivity with other cone types. Instead, H3 dendrites retract and re-extend to contact new ultraviolet cones. But, if regeneration is delayed or absent, blue-cone synaptogenesis increases and ectopic synapses are made with red and green cones. Thus, cues directing synapse specificity can be maintained following input loss, but only within a limited time period. Further, we postulate that signals from the major input that shape the H3 HC's wiring pattern during development persist to restrict miswiring after damage.

Indexed as

AnimalsCuesDendritesImmunohistochemistryMicroscopy, ConfocalOptical ImagingRegenerationRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Horizontal CellsRetinal NeuronsSynapsesUltraviolet RaysZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID26838932
PMCPMC4742908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.