SynthesisCirculation research2016
Impact of Cell Therapy on Myocardial Perfusion and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Angina Refractory to Medical Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Circulation research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell therapy for nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Stem cells translational medicine · 2021Pooled it
- A comprehensive meta-analysis of stem cell therapy for chronic angina.Clinical cardiology · 2018Pooled it
- Stem cell therapy for chronic ischaemic heart disease and congestive heart failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Guideline for Chronic Coronary Syndrome - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Sources and applications of endothelial seed cells: a review.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Review
- Relief of Ischemia in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- Surface-Anchored Nanogel Coating Endows Stem Cells with Stress Resistance and Reparative Potency via Turning Down the Cytokine-Receptor Binding Pathways.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021Article
- Son of a Lesser God: The Case of Cell Therapy for Refractory Angina.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Non-pharmacological Treatment of Refractory Angina and Microvascular Angina.Biomedicines · 2020Review
- Cardiac regenerative therapy: Many paths to repair.Trends in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Review
- Perspectives on Directions and Priorities for Future Preclinical Studies in Regenerative Medicine.Circulation research · 2019Review
- Linking cell function with perfusion: insights from the transcatheter delivery of bone marrow-derived CD133Stem cell research & therapy · 2018Article
- The use of stem cells in ischemic heart disease treatment.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2018Review
- New Advances in the Management of Refractory Angina Pectoris.European cardiology · 2018Review
- Introduction to a Compendium on Regenerative Cardiology.Circulation research · 2018Article
- Clinical Studies of Cell Therapy in Cardiovascular Medicine: Recent Developments and Future Directions.Circulation research · 2018Review
- Transplantation of Allogeneic Pericytes Improves Myocardial Vascularization and Reduces Interstitial Fibrosis in a Swine Model of Reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018Article
- Midterm outcomes of transmyocardial laser revascularization with intramyocardial injection of adipose derived stromal cells for severe refractory angina.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2018Article
- Cardiac Progenitor Cells in Basic Biology and Regenerative Medicine.Stem cells international · 2018Review
- Danhong Injection Enhances the Therapeutic Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Myocardial Infarction by Promoting Angiogenesis.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleThe effect of stem/progenitor cells on myocardial perfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with refractory angina remains unclear because studies published to date have been small phase I-II trials.
objectiveWe performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of cell-based therapy in patients with refractory angina who were ineligible for coronary revascularization. METHODS AND
resultsSeveral data sources were searched from inception to September 2015, which yielded 6 studies. The outcomes pooled were indices of angina (anginal episodes, Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class, exercise tolerance, and antianginal medications), myocardial perfusion, and clinical end points. We combined the reported clinical outcomes (myocardial infarction, cardiac-related hospitalization, and mortality) into a composite end point (major adverse cardiac events). Mean difference (MD), standardized mean differences, or odds ratio were calculated to assess relevant outcomes. Our analysis shows an improvement in anginal episodes (MD, -7.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], -15.22 to -0.41), use of antianginal medications (standardized MD, -0.59; 95% CI, -1.03 to -0.14), Canadian Cardiovascular Society class (MD, -0.58; 95% CI, -1.00 to -0.16), exercise tolerance (standardized MD, 0.331; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.55), and myocardial perfusion (standardized MD, -0.49; 95% CI, -0.76 to -0.21) and a decreased risk of major adverse cardiac events (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.98) and arrhythmias (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.98) in cell-treated patients when compared with patients on maximal medical therapy.
conclusionsThe present meta-analysis indicates that cell-based therapies are not only safe but also lead to an improvement in indices of angina, relevant clinical outcomes, and myocardial perfusion in patients with refractory angina. These encouraging results suggest that larger, phase III randomized controlled trials are in order to conclusively determine the effect of stem/progenitor cells in refractory angina.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.