Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26838794›Full record

SynthesisCirculation research2016

Impact of Cell Therapy on Myocardial Perfusion and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Angina Refractory to Medical Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abdur Rahman Khan, Talha A Farid, Asif Pathan, Avnish Tripathi, Shahab Ghafghazi, Marcin Wysoczynski, Roberto Bolli

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Circulation research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline for Chronic Coronary Syndrome - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Relief of Ischemia in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.Current cardiology reports · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Cardiac regenerative therapy: Many paths to repair.Trends in cardiovascular medicine · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The use of stem cells in ischemic heart disease treatment.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Abdur Rahman KhanFrom the Institute of Molecular Cardiology, University of Louisville, KY.
Talha A FaridFrom the Institute of Molecular Cardiology, University of Louisville, KY.
Asif PathanFrom the Institute of Molecular Cardiology, University of Louisville, KY.
Avnish TripathiFrom the Institute of Molecular Cardiology, University of Louisville, KY.
Shahab GhafghaziFrom the Institute of Molecular Cardiology, University of Louisville, KY.
Marcin WysoczynskiFrom the Institute of Molecular Cardiology, University of Louisville, KY.
Roberto BolliFrom the Institute of Molecular Cardiology, University of Louisville, KY. rbolli@louisville.edu.
University of Louisville · US

Funding

Tumor Necrosis Factor Modulation of CPCsP01HL078825 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI BOLLI, ROBERTO · 2005 to 2021
$37.6M
Project 5 - Metabolomic Analysis of AtherothrombosisP20GM103492 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI HONG, KYUNG UK · 2012 to 2017
$13.8M
University of Louisville Regional Clinical Center for the CCTRNUM1HL113530 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI BOLLI, ROBERTO · 2012 to 2018
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL078825NHLBI NIH HHS UM1 HL113530NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe effect of stem/progenitor cells on myocardial perfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with refractory angina remains unclear because studies published to date have been small phase I-II trials.

objectiveWe performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of cell-based therapy in patients with refractory angina who were ineligible for coronary revascularization. METHODS AND

resultsSeveral data sources were searched from inception to September 2015, which yielded 6 studies. The outcomes pooled were indices of angina (anginal episodes, Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class, exercise tolerance, and antianginal medications), myocardial perfusion, and clinical end points. We combined the reported clinical outcomes (myocardial infarction, cardiac-related hospitalization, and mortality) into a composite end point (major adverse cardiac events). Mean difference (MD), standardized mean differences, or odds ratio were calculated to assess relevant outcomes. Our analysis shows an improvement in anginal episodes (MD, -7.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], -15.22 to -0.41), use of antianginal medications (standardized MD, -0.59; 95% CI, -1.03 to -0.14), Canadian Cardiovascular Society class (MD, -0.58; 95% CI, -1.00 to -0.16), exercise tolerance (standardized MD, 0.331; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.55), and myocardial perfusion (standardized MD, -0.49; 95% CI, -0.76 to -0.21) and a decreased risk of major adverse cardiac events (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.98) and arrhythmias (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.98) in cell-treated patients when compared with patients on maximal medical therapy.

conclusionsThe present meta-analysis indicates that cell-based therapies are not only safe but also lead to an improvement in indices of angina, relevant clinical outcomes, and myocardial perfusion in patients with refractory angina. These encouraging results suggest that larger, phase III randomized controlled trials are in order to conclusively determine the effect of stem/progenitor cells in refractory angina.

Indexed as

Angina PectorisCardiovascular AgentsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyExercise ToleranceHumansPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeCardiovascular Agentscell- and tissue-based therapymeta-analysisperfusionrandomized controlled trialstem cells

Identifiers

PMID26838794
PMCPMC4798914
OpenAlexW2237239357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.