ArticleCirculation research2016
Long-Term Outcome of Administration of c-kit(POS) Cardiac Progenitor Cells After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Transplanted Cells Do not Become Cardiomyocytes, but Structural and Functional Improvement and Proliferation of Endogenous Cells Persist for at Least One Year.
Article in Circulation research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
99 citing papers in PubMed, 173 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Phase II study of autologous mesenchymal stromal cells and c-kit positive cardiac cells, alone or in combination, in patients with ischaemic heart failure: the CCTRN CONCERT-HF trial.European journal of heart failure · 2021Trial
- Comparative Effects of Repeated Intravenous Infusions of Progenitor Cells in a Rat Model of Chronic Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Article
- Development and Characterization of Biodegradable Polymer Filaments for Additive Manufacturing.Polymers · 2025Article
- Review
- A new model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction induced by metabolic syndrome in Ossabaw miniature swine.Basic research in cardiology · 2025Article
- Injectable Stem Cell-Based Therapies for Myocardial Regeneration: A Review of the Literature.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Stem Cell Therapies in Canine Cardiology: Comparative Efficacy, Emerging Trends, and Clinical Integration.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Intravenous infusions of mesenchymal stromal cells have cumulative beneficial effects in a porcine model of chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathy.Cardiovascular research · 2024Article
- The Effect of Parent Cell Type on Small Extracellular Vesicle-Derived Vehicle Functionality.Advanced biology · 2024Article
- Paracrine Responses of Cardiosphere-Derived Cells to Cytokines and TLR Ligands: A Comparative Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Cell Therapy in the Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- C-kitHeliyon · 2023Article
- Local decorin delivery via hyaluronic acid microrods improves cardiac performance, ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2023Article
- Bone Marrow and Wharton's Jelly Mesenchymal Stromal Cells are Ineffective for Myocardial Repair in an Immunodeficient Rat Model of Chronic Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2023Article
- Healing the Ischaemic Heart: A Critical Review of Stem Cell Therapies.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Local delivery of decorin via hyaluronic acid microrods improves cardiac performance and ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction.Research square · 2023Article
- Paracrine effects of mir-210-3p on angiogenesis in hypoxia-treated c-kit-positive cardiac cells.Annals of medicine · 2023Article
- New Opportunities in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: From Bench to Bedside… and Back.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Transplantation of Skeletal Muscle-Derived Sca-1Cells · 2022Article
- Cardiovascular Dysfunction in Intrauterine Growth Restriction.Current hypertension reports · 2022Review
39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleCardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) improve left ventricular remodeling and function after acute or chronic myocardial infarction. However, the long-term (>5 weeks) effects, potential tumorigenicity, and fate of transplanted CPCs are unknown.
objectiveTo assess the outcome of CPC therapy at 1 year. METHODS AND
resultsFemale rats underwent a 90-minute coronary occlusion; 4 hours after reperfusion, they received intracoronarily vehicle or 1 million male, syngeneic CPCs. One year later, CPC-treated rats exhibited smaller scars and more viable myocardium in the risk region, along with improved left ventricular remodeling and regional and global left ventricular function. No tumors were observed. Some transplanted (Y-chromosome(POS)) CPCs (or their progeny) persisted and continued to proliferate, but they failed to acquire a mature cardiomyocyte phenotype and were too few (4-8% of nuclei) to account for the benefits of CPC therapy. Surprisingly, CPC transplantation triggered a prolonged proliferative response of endogenous cells, resulting in increased formation of endothelial cells and Y-chromosome(NEG) CPCs for 12 months and increased formation, for at least 7 months, of small cells that expressed cardiomyocytic proteins (α-sarcomeric actin) but did not have a mature cardiomyocyte phenotype.
conclusionsThe beneficial effects of CPCs on left ventricular remodeling and dysfunction are sustained for at least 1 year and thus are likely to be permanent. Because transplanted CPCs do not differentiate into mature myocytes, their major mechanism of action must involve paracrine actions. These paracrine mechanisms could be very prolonged because some CPCs engraft, proliferate, and persist at 1 year. This is the first report that transplantation of any cell type in the heart induces a proliferative response that lasts at least 1 year. The results strongly support the safety and clinical utility of CPC therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.