Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26838723›Full record

ArticlemBio2016

Maternal Neutralization-Resistant Virus Variants Do Not Predict Infant HIV Infection Risk.

Caitlin Milligan, Maxwel M Omenda, Vrasha Chohan, Katherine Odem-Davis, Barbra A Richardson, Ruth Nduati, Julie Overbaugh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Caitlin MilliganDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Maxwel M OmendaDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Vrasha ChohanDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Katherine Odem-DavisDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Barbra A RichardsonDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ruth NduatiDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Julie OverbaughDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA joverbau@fredhutch.org.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Nairobi · KEUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

University of Washington Medical Scientist Training Program: MD/PhDT32GM007266 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HORWITZ, MARSHALL S. · 1985 to 2023
$30.4M
INTERNATIONAL TRAINING GRANT IN EPIDEMIOLOGYD43TW000007 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FARQUHAR, CAREY · 1988 to 2012
$16.3M
THE ROLE OF ANTIBODIES IN MOTHER TO CHILD HIV TRANSMISSIONR01AI076105 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI OVERBAUGH, JULIE M. · 2008 to 2023
$8.8M
Viral Pathogenesis Training ProgramT32AI083203 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BLOOM, JESSE D, LAGUNOFF, MICHAEL · 2009 to 2023
$2.7M
Fc-Mediated Antibody Responses in HIV-1 Mother-to-Child TransmissionF30AI112385 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MILLIGAN, CAITLIN E · 2014 to 2016
$114k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW000007NIAID NIH HHS F30 AI112385NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI076105NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI083203NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledMother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV provides a setting for studying immune correlates of protection. Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are suggested to contribute to a viral bottleneck during MTCT, but their role in blocking transmission is unclear, as studies comparing the NAb sensitivities of maternal viruses have yielded disparate results. We sought to determine whether transmitting mothers differ from nontransmitting mothers in the ability to neutralize individual autologous virus variants present at transmission. Ten transmitting and 10 nontransmitting HIV-infected mothers at high risk of MTCT were included in this study. Full-length HIV envelope genes (n = 100) were cloned from peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained near transmission from transmitting mothers and at similar time points from nontransmitting mothers. Envelope clones were tested as pseudoviruses against contemporaneous, autologous maternal plasma in neutralization assays. The association between transmission and the log2 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) for multiple virus variants per mother was estimated by using logistic regression with clustered standard errors. t tests were used to compare proportions of neutralization-resistant viruses. Overall, transmitting mothers had a median IC50 of 317 (interquartile range [IQR], 202 to 521), and nontransmitting mothers had a median IC50 of 243 (IQR, 95 to 594). Transmission risk was not significantly associated with autologous NAb activity (odds ratio, 1.25; P = 0.3). Compared to nontransmitting mothers, transmitting mothers had similar numbers of or fewer neutralization-resistant virus variants, depending on the IC50 neutralization resistance cutoff. In conclusion, HIV-infected mothers harbor mostly neutralization-sensitive viruses, although resistant variants were detected in both transmitting and nontransmitting mothers. These results suggest that MTCT during the breastfeeding period is not driven solely by the presence of maternal neutralization escape variants. IMPORTANCE: There are limited data demonstrating whether NAbs can prevent HIV transmission and infection in humans, and for this reason, NAbs have been studied in MTCT, where maternal antibodies are present at the time of transmission. Results of these studies have varied, perhaps because of differences in methods. Importantly, studies often used cultured viruses and samples from time points outside the window of transmission, which could confound findings. Here, we considered the role of maternal NAbs against individual maternal virus variants near the time of transmission. We found no evidence that NAbs are associated with protection from infection. In fact, depending on the cutoff used to define neutralization resistance, we found evidence that nontransmitting mothers have more neutralization-resistant virus variants. These results suggest that lack of virus transmission in the early breastfeeding period is not simply due to an absence of maternal neutralization escape variants and likely includes multiple factors.

Indexed as

Infectious Disease Transmission, VerticalAntibodies, NeutralizingFemaleHIVHIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsHumansInfantInhibitory Concentration 50Neutralization TestsPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRisk AssessmentAntibodies, NeutralizingHIV Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID26838723
PMCPMC4742716
OpenAlexW2259576691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.